Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them

7

AndrewLambertJan 22, 2017

Fantastic Beasts is a intriguing return to the wizarding world, introducing a vastly different universe to explore and some memorably offbeat characters to go with it, in addition to a darker side of the genre that was never explored to itsFantastic Beasts is a intriguing return to the wizarding world, introducing a vastly different universe to explore and some memorably offbeat characters to go with it, in addition to a darker side of the genre that was never explored to its full capability in the Potter movies. That being said, the movie struggles to focus on a coherent storyline and by the time we reach its climax, Beasts has almost totally derailed itself, and the sacrifice of its greatest character in Farrell for the severely waning talents of Depp as Grindelwald feels like a fatal mistake for the remainder of the series.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

1

LockeJohnJan 21, 2017

This is easily one of the worst movies I have ever seen. It was painful to watch. I am the fan of the books, and all the HP movies, but I found this movie boring and unengaging. It's a CGI fest, where you just see colorful pixels movingThis is easily one of the worst movies I have ever seen. It was painful to watch. I am the fan of the books, and all the HP movies, but I found this movie boring and unengaging. It's a CGI fest, where you just see colorful pixels moving around, without any story or meaning. It might be interesting to preschool children.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

travellynJan 10, 2017

Based on the potter world but not in the uk but in New York giving us a chance to see the wizard if world in a new way making this spin of fresh with a great cast out standing effects and visuals and fun but simple story along with someBased on the potter world but not in the uk but in New York giving us a chance to see the wizard if world in a new way making this spin of fresh with a great cast out standing effects and visuals and fun but simple story along with some awesome and cute magic levels creatures … Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

hassallJan 8, 2017

I enjoyed this movie but the bad guy wasnt great we dont know anything about him,why he is bad and stuff. Im not saying i hated this movie but dont say this movie is similar to harry potter the only thing that is slightly similar to harryI enjoyed this movie but the bad guy wasnt great we dont know anything about him,why he is bad and stuff. Im not saying i hated this movie but dont say this movie is similar to harry potter the only thing that is slightly similar to harry potter is they say dumbledore and hogwarts. This movie is not bad not good nowhere near as good as harry potter.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

2

HfahmyJan 4, 2017

Absolute waste of time, no story to drive a scenario, and no scenario to drive acting. Full nonsense, as if magics movie is a permission for absurdity and out of context personalities and events. The only positive in this so called movie areAbsolute waste of time, no story to drive a scenario, and no scenario to drive acting. Full nonsense, as if magics movie is a permission for absurdity and out of context personalities and events. The only positive in this so called movie are the special effects, but that is not sufficient. If someone needs some sleep, he will be granted two hours but at a high ticket price.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

ImpeccableTasteJan 3, 2017

BORING! CGI is really fake looking, and story is just flat. New York looks really depressing, and dark all the time. Redmayne has become addicted to playing his characters on the autism spectrum in my opinion.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

0

BranagunJan 1, 2017

This movie struck me as being a somewhat cynical cash grab. Harry Potter is over, it's finished, well done all involved. This just seems like a third rate fantasy series desperately hanging on Potters coat tails. We are getting five of theseThis movie struck me as being a somewhat cynical cash grab. Harry Potter is over, it's finished, well done all involved. This just seems like a third rate fantasy series desperately hanging on Potters coat tails. We are getting five of these movies? Really, is that what the public wants?… Expand

5 of 9 users found this helpful54

All this user's reviews

8

thedaywalkerDec 31, 2016

Maintaining the magical components of the Harry Potter world and adding more creatures that i couldn't even imagine, and a great twist in the end, just was expecting more from some characters, but if you enjoyed the harry potter franchise,Maintaining the magical components of the Harry Potter world and adding more creatures that i couldn't even imagine, and a great twist in the end, just was expecting more from some characters, but if you enjoyed the harry potter franchise, you will certainly enjoy this movie… Expand

3 of 6 users found this helpful33

All this user's reviews

6

triple_coDec 30, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Aesthetically this is a very well made film that looks the part and has the feel of both the Harry Potter franchise and something new. The creatures, locations and characters all look fantastic. There is a lot of be enjoyed in the colours and visuals throughout the movie.

Story wise however, it lacks clarity and focus and tends to leave plot points unattended. Several characters in this film seem to be swept away by the narrative and are unnecessary to the plot, with a couple ultimately being forgotten about by the end. There were too many main characters, leaving the pacing feeling cluttered and overwhelming. In addition, there was not enough focus on the orphanage, Credence or the main villain, Grindelwald. There was lots of world building throughout, but not enough put on the actual characters of this film.

Enjoyable enough, and a movie that Harry Potter fanatics will love, but it lacks focus and gets a little muddled in its pacing and plot.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

lucbevibrasilDec 27, 2016

The film's premise may be silly, but the script signed by J. Rowling herself is quite complex, layered and well built. Underscoring the way the author conveys sensitive issues of today's society in the magical society of the time. But one ofThe film's premise may be silly, but the script signed by J. Rowling herself is quite complex, layered and well built. Underscoring the way the author conveys sensitive issues of today's society in the magical society of the time. But one of the biggest hits of the film is the independence of the other Harry Potter films, whether on the soundtrack of James Newton Howard (a hit), in the more "free" direction of David Yates and note the work of director of photography Philippe Rousselot. The editing of Mark Day sins, damaging the initial rhythm of the film. Finally, the cast also deserves prominence, especially Eddie Redmayne and Katherine Waterson.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

MyDistUniverseDec 26, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I am the first to admit that I was sceptical about the movie Fantastic Beasts And Where To Find Them. How could you make a movie about the world of Harry Potter without Harry Potter? I needn't have been worried. Clearly, J.K. Rowling knows what she is doing. In a departure from the conventional first writing the story in form of a novel, she skipped a step and went on straight to writing the screenplay instead. With an incredible movie as a result.

The story is about Newt Scamander. Newt is a British wizard who comes to New York in the 1920s. In his possession he has a suitcase filled with magical creatures. He has collected those fantastic beasts all over the world and stopped over in America to release the Thunderbird into the wild to be with other creatures of its kind. After that he is on his way back home to write a book about the fantastic beasts and where to find them. Or so he thought.

A chance encounter with ‘no-maj’ Jacob Kowalski (Dan Fogler) leads to a mix up of their suitcases and ultimately results in some of the creatures getting out. When he meets Newt, a strange new chapter in his life starts.

Trouble brews in form of Percival Graves (Colin Farrell), a powerful wizard and the Director of Security at MACUSA. He appears to have an agenda of his own, which is not quite clear as of yet. But he does meet Credence, a teenage boy and one of Mary Lou’s adopted children in some back alleys to task him with finding a child witch who supposedly possesses unimaginable powers.

The events take the group of new friends all across New York in an effort to catch the escaped creatures and to return them to the magical world Newt has created in his suitcase for them,

The story ends in an epic show down wizard style, with grown men waving their wands like it’s no ones business. There are sparks flying and buildings crumbling.

The CGI effects throughout the movie are spectacular. I highly recommend watching the movie in 3D. The creatures and their world look incredibly real and close enough to touch. It is rather fascinating to watch a tiny little blue insect flapping its wings right in front of your nose.

The story itself is thought provoking and beautiful. It touches on the age old subject of comparing people of different backgrounds against each other. People who lead different lives and people who have different abilities. Who is right and who is wrong. Who is better and who is not. And how do they treat the creatures around them?

Similarities with today’s society is clearly visible to anyone willing to look passed the story of wizardry and transfers the values into the everyday life of the modern world.

We can all learn something from a suitcase full of magical creatures.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

2

varmadmcgooDec 23, 2016

Do you want to see inexplicable creatures floating around and destroying New York City, but you aren’t into superhero films like THE AVENGERS? Would you like to see the collective memory of that same city wiped clean of said incident, andDo you want to see inexplicable creatures floating around and destroying New York City, but you aren’t into superhero films like THE AVENGERS? Would you like to see the collective memory of that same city wiped clean of said incident, and were you born so late that you have no idea what MEN IN BLACK is about? Are you curious what a teen with an evil mother figure might do if bestowed with dangerous powers, but CARRIE and all the POLTERGEIST movies seem icky to you? Have you ever wanted to tame a dragon but decided that a movie called HOW TO TRAIN YOUR DRAGON was a little "on the nose"? Have you ever wanted to travel back in time to see a Carey Mulligan-type actress in a bob, but your parents told you that any adaptation of THE GREAT GATSBY with rap music must be of the devil? Have you yearned to watch an evil swarm of swarmy bee-like things swarm, but you decided STAR TREK BEYOND was too nerdy for you? Or quite simply did you ever wish that there were an incarnation of The Doctor from DOCTOR WHO that managed to never, ever look anyone (snakeypuffs and planticrawls excepted) in the eyes?

YES? To all of that? Then do we ever have the movie for you!

⁂ Fantastical Beasts is a meaningless amalgamation of clichés, borrowed scenes, ineffective attempts to tug at heartstrings, and shockingly bad (for 2016!) special effects. It’s a hammy trope-fest. While the female lead was endearingly played by Katherine Watterston, it wasn’t close to enough to make this film worthwhile. Yes, this is even true if one knows enough of the Potterverse to know who Grindlewald is, although apparently if a Potterhead is desperate enough, this film will taste like manna: Heavenly to the starved, and like generic, flavorless carbohydrates to the rest of us.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

2

KleverViperDec 22, 2016

This film marks the first time I've ever been to see a film in the cinema and have wanted to leave. The film, despite many cool scenes is just boring. The main male characters are not likeable. It isn't 'fun' like the other Harry PotterThis film marks the first time I've ever been to see a film in the cinema and have wanted to leave. The film, despite many cool scenes is just boring. The main male characters are not likeable. It isn't 'fun' like the other Harry Potter films. Don't bother watching.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

0

juliusjunDec 18, 2016

lame lame lame. You can telescope! Why you come to NYC by boat then? What's the use of Tina? Crying? What's the point of Mary Lou? She is against witches? Why she is not destroyed by all-mighty witches? What's the heck of the relations oflame lame lame. You can telescope! Why you come to NYC by boat then? What's the use of Tina? Crying? What's the point of Mary Lou? She is against witches? Why she is not destroyed by all-mighty witches? What's the heck of the relations of Newt's beasts with the antagonist? Nothing! 2 stories! childish childish childish… Expand

2 of 10 users found this helpful28

All this user's reviews

7

DirigiblePulpDec 17, 2016

There's some really good world-building in this film. America in the 1920's? Absolutely brilliant what is done with it. It feels like a very organic extension of the Harry Potter universe; like it has always been this way and we are peekingThere's some really good world-building in this film. America in the 1920's? Absolutely brilliant what is done with it. It feels like a very organic extension of the Harry Potter universe; like it has always been this way and we are peeking back in time in a fictional universe (and not like a different universe altogether, or just shameless fandom branding).

However the plot leaves a lot to be desired. The "Fantastic Beasts" wrapper doesn't wind up nearly as exciting as the world around it. It's a very basic fetch quest type story that merely serves to introduce new characters and places and things; it also serves to dumb-down and grind the interesting stuff to a halt. The action scenes aren't great -- choppy, bad CGI, mindlessness (though not the mating dance which was a real delight) -- they go on a tad too long and don't add much overall.

Rowling clearly knows what she's doing, yet for some reason resorted to a paint-by-numbers plot to get her points across. Maybe it was studio interference (albeit only for the first film, to re-introduce things in a simple way) or maybe all the good stuff is being saved for later (ugh, world-building).

Sorcerer's Stone used a fairly simple plot to build a world, yet it felt like an organic extension of what we were seeing and how it was being shaped and presented to us. Here it feels cheap, unfinished and of two disparate ideas.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

0

CountvontrollioDec 16, 2016

Completely unmemorable. Opens interestingly enough but has nothing propelling the middle and meanders to a muddlesome end. Formulaic as f**k I thought.

3 of 6 users found this helpful33

All this user's reviews

8

Jack97Dec 16, 2016

J.K Rowling's Wizarding World is back, only this time we see a whole new side of it. Seeing the workings of the American wizarding community was fascinating and I can't wait to see more of this world expanded in future films. On top of thatJ.K Rowling's Wizarding World is back, only this time we see a whole new side of it. Seeing the workings of the American wizarding community was fascinating and I can't wait to see more of this world expanded in future films. On top of that we get an entertaining yet simple story populated by likable characters and terrific visuals. Welcome back to the Wizarding World folks!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

Movie1997Dec 13, 2016

For someone that is really into the Harry Potter universe, I was actually kind of excited for this movie. However, the movie was simply enjoyable, but nothing special. I'll start off with some positives. First off, I was intrigued with theFor someone that is really into the Harry Potter universe, I was actually kind of excited for this movie. However, the movie was simply enjoyable, but nothing special. I'll start off with some positives. First off, I was intrigued with the concept of having to recapture the beasts. The beasts were very unique and interesting to watch. As much as I personally do not like Eddie Redmayne as an actor, I thought he was fine as Newt Scamander. Nothing special, but serviceable. I really enjoyed Dan Folger as Kowalski, or the no-maj as he's referred to in the movie. I liked seeing him really get caught up in this world and forming this awkward friendship with Newt Scamander. At the same time, I also found his relationship with the character of Queenie to be even more interesting than I could have possibly imagined. Most importantly, despite the movies numerous "Lord of the Rings" like endings, what happens to Kowalski at the end of the movie honestly left me touched. However, the movie has quite a bit of flaws. The movie suffers from pacing issues. Some scenes played out better than others. The whole Ezra Miller storyline didn't really captivate me and felt as if it was from a completely different movie. But the biggest reveal in the movie, while truly surprising, didn't feel needed in any way, shape or form. If you've seen the movie, you will definitely know what I am talking about. And the ending itself went on way too damn long. Like I mentioned before, I like what happened with the no-maj character, but everything else happening at the end simply did not need to happen. There were definitely two movies going on at the same time, which was very distracting. At the same time, I cared about our main protagonists and wanted to learn more about them, which is why I ended up enjoying the movie in the long run. Overall, for a messy movie, it still provides some interesting new additions to this movie universe that fans will not be disappointed with. I give "Fantastic Beasts" a B-!… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

6

PeterAlexanderDec 13, 2016

Whilst a charming tale, Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them is a noticeable descent from the magic of the Harry Potter series. The main characters are not likeable and the film lacks a proper villain. Due to a somewhat disengaging plot,Whilst a charming tale, Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them is a noticeable descent from the magic of the Harry Potter series. The main characters are not likeable and the film lacks a proper villain. Due to a somewhat disengaging plot, the final act is not the epic conclusion it tries to be. Despite this, it is a fun little movie and the array of beasts themselves are amusing.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

3

rileyball2Dec 11, 2016

*in jk rowlings office* "I'm running out of money from writing all those harry potter books" Jk said, "I need to write a new book and get people to like me again" In walks one of her editors, "Ma'am you already released a book that you didn't*in jk rowlings office* "I'm running out of money from writing all those harry potter books" Jk said, "I need to write a new book and get people to like me again" In walks one of her editors, "Ma'am you already released a book that you didn't write but you did take credit for" "shoot i gotta do something different then how about a movie that is about a textbook from harry potter featuring characters not in harry potter and the only thing similar to harry potter are some key words." "ma'am thats brilliant i'll get the best writers on it."

This is what i imagine the creation of this movie was like. This cashgrab was a poorly produced/directed/written piece of garbage that i'm surprised anyone liked. Are you a fan of harry potter? well this movie says dumbledore and hogwarts so come buy a ticket? Did you only see the movies and haven't kept up with anything J.K has made canon? Good luck keeping up with this movie. I feel like i should've had to buy two tickets to see this as it feels like two completely different plot lines put together into one convuluted mess. I do not recommend you see this movie for any reason.… Expand

8 of 14 users found this helpful86

All this user's reviews

6

smijatovDec 11, 2016

As a Harry Potter fan since the pre-film Harry Potter times, I was clearly extremely excited about the expansion of the magical world that I had come accustomed to explore in the film theatre. The awe-inspiring creativity and ability toAs a Harry Potter fan since the pre-film Harry Potter times, I was clearly extremely excited about the expansion of the magical world that I had come accustomed to explore in the film theatre. The awe-inspiring creativity and ability to project a completely new world onto the screen was what kept on bringing me and millions others back year after year to watch the next installment of the Harry Potter saga.
However, this is a new saga, and, unfortunately, as the reviewer from Entertainment Weekly aptly described, this one seems "numbingly inconsequential." Do not get me wrong, this is not a bad film. But it is not a *good* film either. It is just fine. And that is disappointing. I found it hard to get into the story for the first hour or so. It just did not grab my attention, despite of all the action going on. Later on, I did find myself engrossed in the film, but that was not quite enough. The darkness that the HP films went to by the end is well maintained here. The visuals are beautiful. The CGI is amazing and even a notch better than the last couple of Harry Potter films. There is nothing wrong per se. It is just lacking an emotional connection. And that may be because it is compared to Harry Potter and if we are holding the film to that standard, it never will live up to it. It just cannot. The most redeeming factor for me was the feeling that it was very appropriate to have such a bleak view of the U.S. in the wake of Donald Trump's election. While this was overall not quite as exciting nor engaging as I had hoped it would be, it did set a stage with enough unknowns about this new wizarding world of the U.S. that it will probably easily give itself to the other 4 sequels. Maybe they will develop this emotional connection that this first installment failed to achieve.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

maugeishDec 11, 2016

Way better than the Harry Potter series. More adult and less for kids. The plot is great and characters are amazing. Underrated movie. My movie of the year. Excellent.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

Magic84Dec 11, 2016

Weak villian due to no motivation explained by a weak plot. Special effects are good but as good as smother movies with similar budget. I feel like they tried way too hard to set up this new franchise rather than produce a solid film.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

VirgonoShakaDec 10, 2016

As a big Harry Potter fan in my teenage years, I wasn't sure where to stand in my expectations of this movie. I was hopeful it was going to be good, but was cautious about being too exited, mostly because Harry Potter has lost some of itsAs a big Harry Potter fan in my teenage years, I wasn't sure where to stand in my expectations of this movie. I was hopeful it was going to be good, but was cautious about being too exited, mostly because Harry Potter has lost some of its shine in this stage of my life. But to be honest, I was very pleasently surprised by this movie. It expands in one of the things I always wanted to see more in Harry Potter, the world, and it ends up being the best character of the movie, because you see that outside of Hogwarts there is more to be found and it can be very intersting, charming, and wondrous all in its own. Add to it nice designs for the creatures, excellent music, good mystery, and you have a winning start to a new movie saga. Hopefully the world, the places, and the story continues to impress in the next chapters.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

OrwDec 10, 2016

This film makes you feel like a child. It's full of fantasy, and great characters. Eddie Redmayne is a perfect adition to the Harry Potter world. If you want something original and amazing, this movie is for you. I think it was wonderul.

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

5

TrevorsViewDec 9, 2016

I’m not quite sure what to make of this newest cinematic expansion of the Wizarding World. In one part, Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them feels like a kid’s movie with its majestic use of magic. In another part, its marketing and ratingI’m not quite sure what to make of this newest cinematic expansion of the Wizarding World. In one part, Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them feels like a kid’s movie with its majestic use of magic. In another part, its marketing and rating suggests a teen movie. Yet at the same time, its 1920s setting and cast of adult characters suggests something that would appeal best to those who grew up with the original Harry Potter adventures. Well one thing is for sure, this new adaptation by the immortal J.K. Rowling is not going to appeal to anybody in the long-run.

If anything, Fantastic Beasts seems mostly most like an adventure for the teenage girl, as the very casting of Eddie Redmayne (The Danish Girl, The Theory of Everything) will satisfy their fantasies with his boyish charm, along with a half-baked romance between a down-on-his-luck baker and a zesty accountant. But even so, I doubt any high school cheerleaders would be screaming their heads off over a film focused on combining the roaring twenties with a children’s imagination.

Yet true to what the world of Harry Potter has always done, this historical setting is rich with culture. It turns out that unlike the United Kingdom, America has a different word for muggles; “No-Mags,” and their relationships align much closer to the Salem witch trials than simple racism. The two worlds between the wizards and No-Mags’ each look as captivating as they do true to the historical era, complete with a scandalous goblin singing at a bar.

Then in comes skimpy old Newt Scamander, played by the same British actor I previously mentioned. He arrives in New York City on the Fort Elizabeth, with a secret mission involving his magical briefcase. Just step inside his case, and you will see an immense world inside: room upon room housing some of the most fascinating beasts you will find. These include leafy little bowtruckles, a money-mad niffler, a mischievous demiguise, and a size-shifting occamy. Kids will love seeing these imaginative designs, but what they’re doing in a PG-13 movie I cannot say.

Teens would certainly not care about seeing these beasts anyway, as the special effects used to bring them to life is distractingly awful. Remember in the Harry Potter movies when computer generated imagery was only used when necessary? Now here, it is use in practically every frame for every scenario, even in places where makeup prosthetics would have gotten the job done easy. Think the entire Hobbit trilogy, except without any effort by the visual effects team.

These beasts have ended up under the hands of a No-Mag named Mr. Kowalski who has dreams of starting his own bakery. Yet he mistakenly lets the case open, and several of the beasts loose into the city. Now Newt has to bring him as a witness to protect his innocence from the National Astute of Secrecy, or else face serious criminal penalty for exposing the wizarding community to the No-Mags.

There are points here and there that reveal how a great movie could have been made, but for the greater portion, the blank performances by the majority of the cast send a preposterous message that says the law and government should not control us. If you ask me, these negative, limiting depictions of political authorities is way too common in our movie theaters, and our leaders deserve better treatment. Even worse, this predictable story is ruined all the more by a plot twist that adds nothing; literally nothing to the story.

Yet it doesn’t stop there. After a snore-inducing climax, the final moments try to emotionally manipulate you as if the filmmakers felt that they earned it somehow—they didn’t. Then they of course have to leave the final frame open for a sequel which I obviously will not be looking forward to.

If you think that Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them is a dream come true for your inner witch or wizard, I hate to break it to you: look elsewhere. This attempt at keeping the franchise alive and fresh is only making it age all the more, and its attempted relational bonds between America and England does not feel any stronger either. I could really use a great motion picture that makes us people feel united in spite of differences in a world that wants us to feel otherwise, and this does not accomplish that.… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

6

KaptenVideoDec 9, 2016

Not really my cup of tea anymore but If you're into Harry Potter, current wave of superhero movies, and/or "Night at the Museum", you will probably like it quite a bit.

It will probably make a billion dollars (seriously, even the leastNot really my cup of tea anymore but If you're into Harry Potter, current wave of superhero movies, and/or "Night at the Museum", you will probably like it quite a bit.

It will probably make a billion dollars (seriously, even the least successful "Harry Potter" movie did 800 million dollars in cinemas), and it will have four sequels.

I don't want to spoil anything but don't go just to see Johnny Depp.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

hannah132016Dec 8, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The film is just amazing, with stunning, sets visuals and plot. My favorite character is Jacob the no-mag. Definitely worth paying the admission, it was so amazing that I was left speechless at the end. I love the fact that it has some resemblance to the Harry Potter. I loved how Newts case has lots of dimensions. My favorite beast was the Niffler, I thought it was really quite cute. However it isn't really like the Harry Potter movies, which I think is a good thing because it gives HP fans a chance to see something different by J.K Rowling, with some different actors too. I thought Eddie was the perfect choice for Newt. I loved Dan Fogler too! The film was the best film I have ever seen, I cant wait for the second film. Very developed, worth seeing, definitely entertaining from start to finish.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

6

testuser-4Dec 7, 2016

Set in the magical world of witchcraft, Fantastic Beasts is really worthy of the hype and the stir it's been causing for a almost a year now. The film itself is emotionally charged and action-packed, just like we've come to know everythingSet in the magical world of witchcraft, Fantastic Beasts is really worthy of the hype and the stir it's been causing for a almost a year now. The film itself is emotionally charged and action-packed, just like we've come to know everything Rowling has ever touched. With a great script from JK, great direction from David Yates, outstanding performances from the whole cast (Eddie Redmayne especially), and breath-taking visual effects, it's safe to say that this is the first journey of what looks like a franchise that will be up to the level of the pinnacle that is Harry Potter "testuser-4"… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

7

TokyochuchuDec 6, 2016

Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them is an excellent first chapter in the Harry Potter spin off. It immediately lurches towards the darker aspects of the later potter movies, whilst still maintaining some giddy fun of new discovery. TheFantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them is an excellent first chapter in the Harry Potter spin off. It immediately lurches towards the darker aspects of the later potter movies, whilst still maintaining some giddy fun of new discovery. The world building is great and in general, this is a much more satisfying movie than the early Potter films. Great stuff!… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

0

herman73trioDec 1, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Meet Newt Scamander - wizard - from England, one of Prof Albus Dumbledore's favourite, young, talented, very interesting in magical beasts and sloppy. He came to America, to buy a rare magical beast. His aspire just one : that to make the world of wizard have a better understanding about magical beasts. He come just in not in right moment where ther has been several phenomena in that could've blown the cover of wizards identity in America. Newt stop by in the ladder entry to a bank to hear speech of Mary Lou about wizards living among humans and very dangerous to human mankind - meanwhile a cute niffler manage to escape from Newt magic suitcase and runaway into the bank, Newt found out and try to catch it back. His path cross with a no-mag Kowalksi - a wanna be pastries shop owner, then soon the adventure begins for both of them. Then Newt arrested by a demoted auror Tina Goldstein and brings him to magical congress, so she can get promoted again. But, then things don't happen as she hopes. Cause, in the process when Kowalski escape from Newt, their suit case accidentally swapped - all the magical beasts that Newt hide in that magic suitcase escape, even one of that beast bite Kowalski and cause him a fever. And rhe road to a whole new unforgettable adventure begins for all of them. I do admit that i enjoyed this movie - even though that director David Yates buy too much time to bring all adventure that make me in between of bored, curious and impatience at the same time. But, even i never read any of JK Rowling's book i still can feel that this character Graves - is onto something evil (my opinion cause that choose Collin Farrel - that also known of his ability to play as a villain, but it's not a poor choice, cause Farrel really did his part as a cold magical security). Yates succeeded brings this element of curiousity among audiens that never read this JK Rowling book, what is Graves agenda - who is the wanna be quiet introvert Credence? I also enjoyed the hillarious and emotional moments that Yates build between character Newt-Tina-Kowalski and Queenie. Off course the beasts are fantastic. What i feel is that this first Fantastic Beast is not really of Harry Potter's weight, but Yates manage to delivered this in a such magically fun delightful adventure with such beautiful special effects. But really it was Kowalski character that steal moments while the others - not mediocre - even though not fantastic but really fits in. My final conclusion is : "The whole plots not kick hard enough but...really entertaining"… Expand

4 of 8 users found this helpful44

All this user's reviews

7

Maggie0908hsuDec 2, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. There're endless possibilities for JK Rowling and her magic world. I do love them, while this movie should be about the beasts, but in fact it spent too much time on dark magic. When the dark shadows came out, I just couldn't help think of the movie "Mama".… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

5

Xan_RyilDec 2, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Here’s what’s wrong with Fantastic Beasts…!!!!

1. Eddie Redmayne
Eddie could hold first 10 position on this list because of his worst ever portrayal of any character written by J. K Rowling. It’s a new low by an Oscar winner. Even with all the efforts by writer and director, Eddie not only failed to make audience feel infatuated with him but one can’t even relate to his character. It has something to do with his hate towards camera’s lenses or his love for his side profile that he would rather should his left cheek most of the time instead of facing the camera. His acting is pretty much unidimensional. Character shows no development or attachment to anyone besides harnessing some weird animals. 2. Rest of the cast
As much as we praised the casting director of Harry Potter for bringing such brilliant mix to our lives, audience will curse the casting director of Fantastic for the job to bring worst performers on the screen…altogether. None of the actors could really fit in the character (much thanks to J. K. Rowling’s very weak characterization). Every actor seems to be the miss fit. And wearing weird costumes and hair. Lead characters seems to miss the cohesiveness among them even they witch sisters are distant. Some characters hardly acknowledge another’s screen presence.

3. The adventure
Unlike Harry Potter and as the movie is sold, there is less or no adventure involved. Eventually the biggest threat is the exposure (which does not sound that much of a threat). There is nothing left in the action sequence when it’s known to be harmless to living being whether it’s animal or dark force which despite of revolving around the person who betrayed him does not hard him a bit ( not even his hair were messed up while Eddie’s were all messed up throughout )

4. Plotline and Characterization
Story is pretty much vague, we never know, how did the beasts escaped at the first? Here much is left to imagination or presumption that only die hard readers of the books are watching the movie. Also the intentions of characters are not clear, why Newt is taking Jacob to everywhere, only likeness is not enough, beside the movie would have still be the same without Jacob as he plays no role in whole movie at all. Same is the character of Queenie and her affection for Jacob. Some sub plots used, were only waste of budget especially Shaw’s death and his father & brother’s rage. Signing John Voight for a role which has no significance was mismanagement by studio. I personally struggled to have fun during most of the part. Story was plain straight and offered no excitement.

5. Finale
Ending is very much like any other super hero movie. Someone trying to take over and destroying building during its movement however it does not do much harm we’ll give it that ( and they can’t come up with sequel where heroes will be held responsible or be divided among themselves to take responsibility of the destruction and mass murder). Even though Tine was closer to credence (a character which should won award for the worst hair cut in history of mankind), she sends Newt to save and talk to him. Another failed effort by W Bros to create beloved hero (but with Eddie’s stupid acting or in words of Sia “Cheap Thrills” it’s impossible). Graves’ intentions about obscurus and newt are so unclear. It’s not revealed what he wanted to do with obscurus and it was annoying what he was doing with Newt in the subway. As is the fact that they have planned 4 more movies after this adventure less movie. What’s good with Fantastic Beasts?

1. Collin Farrell
Mr. Farrell is the best thing in the movie. Although his character lacks the depth and background but Collin gave persona and intensity to it. He literally owned every frame he was in. He could have been one of those series antagonists who are both evil and memorable. 2. Cameo
I was not going to write it as it would have caused “Spoiler Alert” but I cannot, not write about it. Johnny Depp’s cameo is the best cameo ever in film or television. Even that I had read about it, still I completely forgot and almost jumped out of my seat to see him. He gave us hope.

3. Future prospects
Now that Eddie is signed and played Newt, they can’t replace him but J. K. Rowling can bring Albus Dumbledore in the story and make him the lead instead. It would make the story much mature, dark and fan favorite.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

7

MattyiceNov 30, 2016

While Fantastic Beasts does not capture the entire magic of the Harry Potter movies, it does get a lot of things right. The effects and beasts themselves are great. The acting is solid, despite the characters not being completely likable.While Fantastic Beasts does not capture the entire magic of the Harry Potter movies, it does get a lot of things right. The effects and beasts themselves are great. The acting is solid, despite the characters not being completely likable. However, the strongest aspect of the film is its early 20th century New York setting, which is lively and, for the lack of a better word, fantastic. Despite these pros, the film drags a bit in the middle and its subplots are rather forced and confusing. In the end, though, Fantastic Beasts is a solid spinoff of the widely successful Potter movie series.… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

9

NShep53Nov 29, 2016

Dan Fogler made this movie for me and the rest of the cast was great. Funny, dark, charming and exciting, Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them was a great surprise. Wasn't expecting it to live up to the legacy, but it does.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

Legoguy6100Nov 29, 2016

As a huge fan of the Harry Potter movies, I was absolutely blown away by this film. From the nostalgic opening titles and classic score to the stunning visuals, this film more then exceeded the hype and expectations surrounding it, prior toAs a huge fan of the Harry Potter movies, I was absolutely blown away by this film. From the nostalgic opening titles and classic score to the stunning visuals, this film more then exceeded the hype and expectations surrounding it, prior to its release. Like every film, this one had it's problems, including recycled elements from the original Harry Potter movies. These factors include an overly abusive adoptive family (physically and mentally) as well as constant visits to an orphanage. These two factors were unnecessary- but didn't take too much time away from the mysterious marvel that was the rest of the film. A lot of things were cut out of the movie, as expected from a film from a series like this. The words "I want to be a wizard" were never said. Newt never stops in front of the police offers and says "You have absolutely nothing to worry about." The scene in which Newt stands on a roof top in daylight with two others next to him? Never shown. All complaints aside, this is one of the best movies I've seen in a while. This film was at the top of my list for most anticipated films for the year- and it didn't disappoint. This is truly a flick that will satisfy long-time fans of the Wizarding World, as well as welcome viewers to the incredible universe.… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

10

Bigchris27Nov 29, 2016

OK I had to see this movie as soon as I heard about it and I gotta say that I had a blast watching the movie it had charm good plot loveable characters and action packed fun I kinda fell in love with chassity she was hilarious and adorable goOK I had to see this movie as soon as I heard about it and I gotta say that I had a blast watching the movie it had charm good plot loveable characters and action packed fun I kinda fell in love with chassity she was hilarious and adorable go see this wonderful movie this holiday season you won't be sorry take the tweens Along with you have a good night at the movies… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

8

madmoviemanNov 29, 2016

This film is so good until it really isn’t. I’m not a Harry Potter die-hard, but I can say that, for the most part, Fantastic Beasts And Where To Find Them is a near-perfect series opener for this spin-off franchise to the Harry PotterThis film is so good until it really isn’t. I’m not a Harry Potter die-hard, but I can say that, for the most part, Fantastic Beasts And Where To Find Them is a near-perfect series opener for this spin-off franchise to the Harry Potter series. For over an hour and a half, it’s a film filled with glee, humour and imagination, as well as brains, strong directing and acting, and visuals, something that I absolutely loved until its crushingly disappointing final act, putting a real taint on the film as a whole.

But before I get into that, let’s talk about how this film works in comparison to the Harry Potter series. Thankfully, this film takes an almost totally different direction. With only hints and references to things we all know and love, this is a completely separate world and story from Hogwarts at the turn of the 21st Century, something that I was utterly delighted to see, as it allowed not only for more unpredictability and excitement in this film alone, but also opens up an endless world of possibilities for the films ahead.

Of course, we know that we’ll be getting many Fantastic Beasts sequels in the future, but I’m glad to say that this is a fantastic footing to start the franchise from. Despite the return of director David Yates from the last four Harry Potter films, the film has a distinctly different atmosphere in all ways from those movies. Save for one side plot, the film is wonderfully light-hearted, full of bright colours, and has a wide array of funny, energetic and interesting characters.

Because of that, I was smiling and having a great time for the first two acts of this movie. David Yates does an excellent job at confidently giving the film that vibe, whilst J.K. Rowling’s script isn’t just an entertaining adventure, but also features some intriguing elements about the wider context of the wizarding world in 1920s NYC, leaving the door open for a fascinating story arc.

Also, the performances here are excellent. Every one of the lead actors is brilliant from start to finish, adding to the film’s wonderful vibrancy and imagination. Redmayne, Waterston, Dan Fogler and Alison Sudol are a dynamite leading quartet, all with fantastic chemistry at every moment, reminiscent of the good old days from The Philosopher’s Stone where Harry, Ron and Hermione were all having fun and adventures, something that relit the joy in my heart that was missing in the later films of the Harry Potter series.

In short, there’s so much to love and enjoy about Fantastic Beasts And Where To Find Them, right up until its final act.

In a few seconds, the film switches from a bright and imaginative adventure to the most generic and dull blockbuster climax you can imagine. Apart from the genuinely painful overload of CGI throughout (there are moments when you can see nothing but it on screen), the story takes a dive, losing the camaraderie and intelligence of the earlier acts, in exchange for a city destruction sequence against a cloud of metal.

Whilst the final few minutes return the film to its earlier glory, the entire final act felt like it dragged on for an eternity, adding very little to both this film’s story and options for the future, showcasing loud, brash and boring action again and again. Having been so enchanted by this new world for so long, I was absolutely crushed by the final act’s disappointment, but I hope that it can be recognised as a simple fix for future films.

Overall, I really enjoyed the majority of this film. Imaginative, intelligent, bright and beautifully light-hearted, it’s a film that will warm your heart and put a smile on your face. Its strong directing, screenplay and acting all go a long way to making it even better, but it’s just the terrible disappointment of a final act that brings it all down a peg.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

9

Tss5078Nov 28, 2016

J.K. Rowling may have ended the Harry Potter series, but she isn't done writing about her magical world. Her latest series Fantastic Beasts has finally hit theaters, with the first of what will be a five film series, that starts off a hundredJ.K. Rowling may have ended the Harry Potter series, but she isn't done writing about her magical world. Her latest series Fantastic Beasts has finally hit theaters, with the first of what will be a five film series, that starts off a hundred years before Harry Potter stepped into Hogwarts. The film is centered on Newt Scamander (Eddie Redmayne), who has come to New York City as part of his quest to save the endangered species of the magical world. These creatures live in what appears to be a suitcase, but when some of them escape and a muggle is exposed to Scamander's attempts to retrieve them, he finds himself in a world of trouble. Scamander's only salvation is that with another unknown creature and a dark wizard on the loose, there are other things to worry about, so he is sent with an agent (Katherine Waterston), and the muggle, to collect his creatures and to try to help figure out what is going on. Even though this movie takes place a hundred years before Harry Potter the special effects and especially the CGI on all the creatures involved is amazing! Even if I watched this film without the sound on, I'd still be blown away by how visually impactful it is. As for it's star, they cast one of the biggest up and comers in Hollywood, Eddie Redmayne, and he is perfect for the role. Redmayne is exactly like Harry and the kind of character Rowling loves to write about. He's this geeky, skinny, soft spoken, lovable loser, that no one would expect to be perhaps a hero in waiting. Aside from some corny jokes thrown in for the kids and die hard Potter fans, this movie was absolutely fantastic and I can't wait to see where it goes next. Rowling has stated that the other films will focus on other characters, including a younger Dumbledore, which I'm a bit indifferent to. I really liked this film, and I am curious to know what would be the point in a sequel that starts over. I'd imagine it would be to introduce everyone and then bring them all together in the end, but no matter what they do, the producers will be hard pressed to out due this film.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

adpirtleNov 28, 2016

FBaWtFT is as good as a film based on a spin-off novella written for charity has any right to be, and better than the ninth film in any franchise should be expected to be. It's got all the wonder and none of the bad child-acting of theFBaWtFT is as good as a film based on a spin-off novella written for charity has any right to be, and better than the ninth film in any franchise should be expected to be. It's got all the wonder and none of the bad child-acting of the original Harry Potter films. What more can be said than that?… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

9

MalifixNov 28, 2016

The movie was a great opening to new characters in a familiar world. There are lines dropped about characters we know, but this film provides lots of fresh material in the wizarding world we are used to.

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

6

Dr_Shooter24Nov 28, 2016

It's a quite dissapointing film, taking into account where it comes from. There is not any memorable characters as it used to be in Harry Potter, and it's lack of wit makes it a dull film. At least it is quite entertaining, but there isIt's a quite dissapointing film, taking into account where it comes from. There is not any memorable characters as it used to be in Harry Potter, and it's lack of wit makes it a dull film. At least it is quite entertaining, but there is nothing that really makes it attractive apart from the fact that i's origin. Eddie Redmayne it´s ok, but he is suspiciously becoming a little bit repeatitive in his performances.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

5

CicoNutNov 28, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. J.K. Rowling’s long awaited return to the wizarding world has finally hit cinemas,and it’s not the best movie about sorcerers duking it out in New York to come out this year *cough* Doctor Strange *cough*. In fact, it might just be one of the worst Harry Potter movies so far. But why is this?

Firstly, the movie is far too overstuffed. We are in about half an hour and despite being introduced to him, we know virtually nothing about the protagonist. That’s not always a problem, but when it’s universe building your making time for, it can take you out of the film’s narrative. And this throughout the movie, as it hops back and forth between the main story of Newt Scamander (Eddie Redmayne) gathering his fantastic beasts, a side story about Credence (Ezra Miller) being abused by his mother, another story about Collin Farrell being a fat ugly pale Johnny Depp (spoilers) and another side story about a business man and his son, who runs for president, but promptly dies. And then that story goes absolutely nowhere. Because apparently adult drama became too sophisticated for a wizard movie.

The other problem is the title is misleading: it’s called, ‘Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them’, yet some of the creatures just look like hybrid monstrosities and the rest look like already existing animals with giant testicles on their heads. Ew. And the pre-2005 era CGI looks horrendous.

But there is a lot to like in this film, too. Dan Fogler is an absolute joy to watch on screen and steals literally every scene he’s in. That’s why seeing his memory erased in the end saddened me, as it means there won’t be any more Jacob Kowalsky later movies. Aside from him though, Eddie Redmayne does his usual, socially awkward shtick where he just kind of acts like himself, while Katherine Waterson and Fine Frenzy to good jobs as the magical Goldstein Sisters.

While there are some aspects of this movie you can enjoy, you will most likely be disappointed in the not-so-fantastic beasts and the way J.K. Rowling shamelessly tries to cash in on the successes of Marvel and Star Wars, as she spends so much time setting up sequels she ultimately fails to have a little fun and actually tell a good story, which we know she is well capable of doing.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

VadertimeNov 28, 2016

So, we went and saw the movie on the second weekend of it's release, due to timing. This was a different movie than the Harry Potter series, less dark and more optimistic. With Harry Potter one had the overwhelming presence of Lord Vordemort.So, we went and saw the movie on the second weekend of it's release, due to timing. This was a different movie than the Harry Potter series, less dark and more optimistic. With Harry Potter one had the overwhelming presence of Lord Vordemort. Here, it was more free-form and almost to the point of frivolous enjoyment.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

4

jakem1000Nov 27, 2016

As a fan of the original HP books and movies, this was a huge disappointment. The characters are two-dimensional, the story is both contrived and bizarre. This film is basically an excuse for Warner Bros to make two hours of CGI madnessAs a fan of the original HP books and movies, this was a huge disappointment. The characters are two-dimensional, the story is both contrived and bizarre. This film is basically an excuse for Warner Bros to make two hours of CGI madness (think Michael Bay meets Harry Potter), and make a guaranteed profit. It had potential, but it didn't meet it.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

Seymour_MoviesNov 27, 2016

Fantastically average movie that is only worth watching as an extension to the Harry Potter films. While there was nothing outrageously bad about his movie, there was nothing great about it either. If not connected to the HP series, thisFantastically average movie that is only worth watching as an extension to the Harry Potter films. While there was nothing outrageously bad about his movie, there was nothing great about it either. If not connected to the HP series, this would have been a made for TV movie or worse.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

7

RobBob99Nov 27, 2016

A solid start to this new franchise, the World Building and establishing the Wizarding World in America was the most dynamic part of this film. Fantastic Beasts proved to be a weird movie to judge, there wasn't anything exceptional about theA solid start to this new franchise, the World Building and establishing the Wizarding World in America was the most dynamic part of this film. Fantastic Beasts proved to be a weird movie to judge, there wasn't anything exceptional about the movie, at the same time there wasn't anything bad about it either. Fantastic Beasts proved to be a fun movie with two solid performances from Eddie Redmayne and Colin Farrell.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

8

alejandro970Nov 27, 2016

From the universe of Harry Potter, a spin-off that fulfill the expectations of fanboys with own magic, witty dose of british humor and charming roles, specially Redmayne.

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

3

AquaMorphNov 26, 2016

This movie was par for the course for 2016 blockbuster films. Featuring poor writing and forgettable characters and villains. This movie does manage to be funny at times which saves it from being a total disaster. It is full of every badThis movie was par for the course for 2016 blockbuster films. Featuring poor writing and forgettable characters and villains. This movie does manage to be funny at times which saves it from being a total disaster. It is full of every bad directing habit of David Yates. The action sequences are boring and discombobulating. The story is all over the place and full of one denominational characters. JK Rowling's screenplay is no where near the level as her books. The cast is still good and tries to do there best with a terrible script and poor directing but that is unable to save the film.… Expand

3 of 8 users found this helpful35

All this user's reviews

10

LinttaFlamingoNov 26, 2016

Harry Potter is the biggest part of my childhood, so it's no surprise that I was waiting for Fantastic Beasts more than anything else this year. But finally the wait is over, and I can feast on this movie with my eyes! And for all youHarry Potter is the biggest part of my childhood, so it's no surprise that I was waiting for Fantastic Beasts more than anything else this year. But finally the wait is over, and I can feast on this movie with my eyes! And for all you Potterheads out there, I've got some good news! Fantastic Beasts is just what the title says, it is fantastic. The biggest surprise for me was the fact that this movie doesn't rely on nostalgia and just try to set up sequels, but instead it gives us a good story, interesting characters portrayed by fantastic actors and last but not least, it gives us the feeling that we really are in the Harry Potter world once again! There's magic, there's wonder, there's color and an overall feeling of warmth here. Eddie Redmayne was such a good choice for the main role, his performance was fantastic, and so was Dan Fogler's as the funny sidekick character. It's just so nice that the movie didn't suck because I'm the biggest Potterhead and it feels good to have a new movie in the series.… Expand

3 of 6 users found this helpful33

All this user's reviews

6

SouthboundbevyNov 25, 2016

The movie doesn't capture the magic of Harry Potter movies, but it is ok. I just hope that future installments will be better. I need a better story and characters I could like more.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

masamunerikuNov 25, 2016

Fantastic beasts is a movie that tries to be several things at once. It tells the story about catching beasts and about the wizardry world in the US. Even though it manages to do both it does not excel at one.

The disparate story between theFantastic beasts is a movie that tries to be several things at once. It tells the story about catching beasts and about the wizardry world in the US. Even though it manages to do both it does not excel at one.

The disparate story between the two aspects results in uneven pacing in the storytelling. The first half focuses on the beast catching while the rest is about the issues surrounding the world of US wizardry. In the end none is completely fleshed out.

This movie is also heavily character driven due to the light plot. The characters in the movie are hit-or-misses. Some may like them while other may find the main characters to be ditzy and at times *oblivious*. The villains feel cookie-cutter and superficial as the story never dives deeper into them. The movie is a treat for HP fans as it expands the HP universe complete with references to original HP world. Others who find the characters likable and enjoy a light plot on wizards and imaginary beasts will find it worth the admission and time.

---
In my opinion they should've made Fantastic Beasts as a TV series focusing on 'beasts' while the story on US wizardry world should be a standalone movie with a more substantial plot.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

6

MattBrady99Nov 25, 2016

"Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them" is a cute, funny, and enchanting film that I had a lot of fun with.

It doesn't cheat itself by using nostalgic or references to win you over. It manages stands on it's own feet and give us a fresh"Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them" is a cute, funny, and enchanting film that I had a lot of fun with.

It doesn't cheat itself by using nostalgic or references to win you over. It manages stands on it's own feet and give us a fresh look of the wizarding world. That's the biggest praise I can give to this movie, as you can watch this without any acknowledgment of the Harry Potter films and you still know what's going on. I know fans will embrace this spin-off and rightly so.

Eddie Redmayne was excellent as Newt Scamander. He's likable, engaging, and has a very distinct personality. The same goes to Dan Fogler as Jacob Kowalski who isn't the annoying sidekick that I thought he was going to be. He added a lot to this film, which is the laughter and heart to the story. Come to my surprise, his character towards the end was the most emotional part of the film.

The rest of the cast were pretty solid and I can easily see fans falling in love with the characters.

Katherine Waterston was good as Tina, who's investigating the strange things that's going on in New York City.

When I said that Fogler brought the laughter and emotion to the story - well Colin Farrell (Percival Graves) and Ezra Miller (Credence) brought the dramatic elements. Both of their scenes I found pretty intense and was more interested in that story-line.

David Yates can be a hit or miss for me. (*COUGH COUGH* "The Legend of Tarzan" *COUGH COUGH*). I did like "Order of the Phoenix" and "Deathly Hallows: Part 2". The other's on the another hand, not so much. But I can say this about Yates, he understands the universe very well and him returning to direct must feel like home to him. While the action scenes are basic and duels aren't that special, but the best part & the main focus are the characters.

My issues with the film are mostly with the effect's, editing mistakes, and the heavy exposition scenes.

I kinda wish there was more practical work with none-effect characters. Like the Goblins or Elves didn't have to be cgi and could've easily had make-up on. Because the effect's for them looked fake and pretty bad which is unfortunate to say. It really did stick out and not in a good way.

Overall rating: There's plenty of room for improvement for "Fantastic Beasts", but the flaws didn't stop me from enjoying the film. And I don't mind that there's gonna be five of these. Seriously, I don't mind at all.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

DBPirate1129Nov 25, 2016

Fantastic Beasts is an absolute blast and a great opener to this new story in the Wizarding World. It has all the magic of the Harry Potter franchise, while at the same time bringing in new elements and standing on its own without relying tooFantastic Beasts is an absolute blast and a great opener to this new story in the Wizarding World. It has all the magic of the Harry Potter franchise, while at the same time bringing in new elements and standing on its own without relying too much on nostalgia or the previous entries. I don't want to spoil too much but this film was much darker than I was expecting. This is definitely a more mature version of J.K. Rowling's universe. The acting is fantastic. Eddie Redmayne as Newt was a great choice but I would say the standout is probably Colin Farrell as Percival Graves. He stole every scene he was in. Fantastic Beasts is full to the brim with imagination. It truly shows how many tricks Rowling still has up her sleeve. It's pretty impressive how her first screenplay/film is already up to par with her extremely innovative book series. This is definitely not like other prequels when it comes to substance. It's original, it's complex, and it's engaging. And I say that as someone who liked the Star Wars prequels.

Unfortunately, since I'm not an official critic, I can only give scores out of 10 but if I could give scores out of 100, this would be a 96. For Harry Potter fans, this probably ranks somewhere in between 3rd and 4th place out of all the films. For me, that'd be between Prisoner of Azkaban and Half-Blood Prince.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

7

TimW001Nov 25, 2016

The first half of this movie moves at a very slow pace with no music or rhythm. The first half is quite boring. The second is a lot of fun and adventure. With a great climax to the movie as well. If you're a fan of the Harry Potter series youThe first half of this movie moves at a very slow pace with no music or rhythm. The first half is quite boring. The second is a lot of fun and adventure. With a great climax to the movie as well. If you're a fan of the Harry Potter series you will love this film, but otherwise it may not be worth seeing.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

4

lancekozNov 25, 2016

Strange world now... such over the top incredible seamless effects, incredible hi-price cast, and people-who-really-know-stuff Art Direction... in service to such a silly, cliche-laden story that only children could love, but at the sameStrange world now... such over the top incredible seamless effects, incredible hi-price cast, and people-who-really-know-stuff Art Direction... in service to such a silly, cliche-laden story that only children could love, but at the same time, too complex and dark for children. Starts out with some light and fantastic moments, ends up about as pleasant (and loud) as a weekend in Aleppo, Syria. Oddly touches on Fascism, waterboarding, Trump... with dragons. The pre-modern visualization of New York city was wonderful. But brief.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

tethysdustNov 24, 2016

I was not expecting much, since this is a kind of prequel to Harry Potter based on a fictional textbook. However, J.K. Rowling really did not drop the ball here. I love how she has brought the US wizarding world to life, taking into accountI was not expecting much, since this is a kind of prequel to Harry Potter based on a fictional textbook. However, J.K. Rowling really did not drop the ball here. I love how she has brought the US wizarding world to life, taking into account a variety of real-life cultural differences between the US and the UK. There's a lot of imagination and a lot going on in this story, all while it introduces us to a new cast of interesting characters. I liked that the No-Maj character is not simply comic relief (though he is pretty funny).… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

5

BadAidsNov 24, 2016

It's been nearly half a decade since Pottheads got their last fix from the silver screen and for many a JK-Junkie out there, Fantastic Beasts and Where To Find Them was the most eagerly anticipated film of 2016. Fantastic Beasts offers anIt's been nearly half a decade since Pottheads got their last fix from the silver screen and for many a JK-Junkie out there, Fantastic Beasts and Where To Find Them was the most eagerly anticipated film of 2016. Fantastic Beasts offers an interesting mix of familiarity and new beginnings as the Potterverse welcomes back David Yeats, director of the previous 4 Harry Potter installments, and sees J.K Rowling's maiden voyage as a screenwriter.
I've always been a fan of the Potter films, save for my hatred of Deathly Hallows:Part 1, and I was certainly looking forward to seeing what else Rowling had to offer but this films serves as more of an appetiser rather than a main course. Full of great effects and solid performances from Redmayne and Fogler, the film offers very little in terms of story, which, when considering this was penned by one of the most successful authors of all time, is largely dissappointing.
Set in a beautifully designed 1920's New York, clearly no expense was spared for the effects budget as Fantastic Beasts does exactly what it says on the tin by offering the audience a sample of some beautifully imaginative creatures. Unfortunately this is a case of style over substance as by the end of the film the beasts are playing second fiddle to a dim-witted auror (Katherine Waterston)and the American Ministry of Magic subplot. An interesting point to note is some of the darker tones that Rowling is attempting to examine this time round. Child abuse, albeit a theme in previous Potter films, and capital punishment spring to mind but there is certain, uncomfortable and perhaps perverted atmosphere between Graves (Farrell) and Credence Barebone (Miller) that I found odd. This darker tone, not too disimilar from the later Potter films, was an intriguing element in the film and I'm interested in whether or not these will be explored in the forecoming sequels. On a broader scale, Fantastic Beasts is similar to Warcraft(2016), by way of an underwhelming film that will no doubt produce several offspring. The film markets itself on the idea of a new story set in a familiar universe but, under it's thin layer of narrative, lies the all too familiar shell of a money-hungry franchise... But hey! thats Hollywood folks, so buy your overpriced popcorn, sit back, relax and let this wave of mediocrity wash over you.… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

8

angelsanzcorreaNov 24, 2016

Heartwarming, fun, engrossing, absorbing, with mysterious yet lovable characters (as most fantasy movies should be) but slightly naïve and with a predictable plot.

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

8

TLHGNov 24, 2016

THIS IS A BETTER GHOSTBUSTERS REBOOT THAN WE SAW EARLIER THIS YEAR! This movie is a fantastic experience and got me excited about all the other cool and curious ideas that J.K. can pull out of her hat! The main character is very charming andTHIS IS A BETTER GHOSTBUSTERS REBOOT THAN WE SAW EARLIER THIS YEAR! This movie is a fantastic experience and got me excited about all the other cool and curious ideas that J.K. can pull out of her hat! The main character is very charming and weird, awesome to see him dealing with this crazy creatures haunting New York city! The main villains are great and it seems that their arc was just set up in this movie and probably we will learn more about them in the future! Oh and the soundtrack -> it is not John Williams, but is just as good!
Now there are four flaws that I found with this flick and, although the final assemble of everything is great, this things do get annoying at some points: (1) CGI in this movie is really in your face, very easy to spot, very distracting, this movie required a better work; (2) lack of creativity with the creatures, there some amazing ones, but most are quite random and could be pokemons just as much; (3) some very important characters (mostly Porpentina, but not only) are so lifeless it feels like they came from the Twilight movies; and, (4)it is impossible to avoid comparing with the HP movies and, I don't know if it is the characters or if it is America, or the whole blend of things, but Fantastic Beasts... is just so much less charming than any of the HP movies that, if they don't correct the course for the next ones, setting up this series is just not worth it. Despite these things, it is a great movie and I loved it both as a HP and as a Ghostbusters fan =P… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

8

SSH83Nov 23, 2016

The only blondie is an airhead. The white hair ones are either incompetent or evil. There is no shortage of bad things and plot holes, but the fantastic production outshines it all. The CG really turned Rowling's quriky monsters intoThe only blondie is an airhead. The white hair ones are either incompetent or evil. There is no shortage of bad things and plot holes, but the fantastic production outshines it all. The CG really turned Rowling's quriky monsters into Fantastic beasts, and the principle cast did a good job at making me care about their characters. Rowling's go-to-choice for a whimsical adventure with foreshadowing of greater plot is still here and it's good entertainment... if you just accept it for what it is... a kid's movie.… Expand

3 of 6 users found this helpful33

All this user's reviews

9

TSTINKERSNov 23, 2016

I really enjoyed this movie. It's basically like a Harry Potter. Lots of new characters and not everything was predictable either. There will be sequel!

4 of 7 users found this helpful43

All this user's reviews

6

NihilisticNov 23, 2016

I had mixed feelings about this movie, I did like the characters, parts of the story, and the special effects. Over all however, I found the movie to be dull and boring. It lost most of the dark elements that I liked in Harry Potter, but weI had mixed feelings about this movie, I did like the characters, parts of the story, and the special effects. Over all however, I found the movie to be dull and boring. It lost most of the dark elements that I liked in Harry Potter, but we shouldn't be comparing this with the main series, since the movie feels like a standalone. It was shallow, digging only slightly in topics and themes. This ensured that the movie was entertaining to watch.. or was it? I personally found myself blanking out at moments during the movie and tried to look for a deeper meaning within the movie. I couldn't much apart from clichés and an overall average movie. The abuse was used to make the movie seem more mature, yet I was thinking about why I was watching a movie aimed at children.… Expand

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

8

Iky009Nov 21, 2016

It already starts off with the iconic soundtrack that enshrined all the Harry Potter films. Now what about Fantastic Beasts ?, Well this is easy, it's a great movie, I swore it would be more of a '' The Hobbit '' but I fiercely burned myIt already starts off with the iconic soundtrack that enshrined all the Harry Potter films. Now what about Fantastic Beasts ?, Well this is easy, it's a great movie, I swore it would be more of a '' The Hobbit '' but I fiercely burned my tongue. With a beautiful soundtrack, impeccable art direction and great visual effects, it's a movie that will win all Harry Potter fans, not by playing in the same world of the eternal wizard, but by carrying the same familiar essence of his films, and Without Johnny Depp (who was strongly criticized) who even appearing for a few minutes, steals the scene and shows that he could be a great villain.… Expand

3 of 7 users found this helpful34

All this user's reviews

8

imthenoobNov 23, 2016

It's great to jump back into the series after a few years absence. Really enjoyed the main cast, Specifically Farrell and Redmayne. Shout out to Dan Fogler, He gave a much better performance than I expected and really had a lovable character.It's great to jump back into the series after a few years absence. Really enjoyed the main cast, Specifically Farrell and Redmayne. Shout out to Dan Fogler, He gave a much better performance than I expected and really had a lovable character. I thought Ezra Miller was by far the weakest part of the cast, Mainly due to how his character was written and not acted. Plot wise is was a little bit basic but there was enough action and plot twists to keep you interested in for the full run time. It's a very beautiful and well directed/edited film. I wish they tried more variety among spell use rather than the same 3-4 spells over and over again but that's just me.

Overall, I really enjoyed it. I had no real issue with the movie and can't wait to see the second one. Certainly lived up to expectations as a spin off and more than lived up to the hype.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

6

ScarlettMiNov 23, 2016

This movie was all over the place. Sometimes it was dark and compelling (Samantha Morton, Colin Farrell, Ezra Miller). Sometimes it was fun, energetic, and charming (Dan Fogler, Alison Sudol). And sometimes it was bland and forgettable (EddieThis movie was all over the place. Sometimes it was dark and compelling (Samantha Morton, Colin Farrell, Ezra Miller). Sometimes it was fun, energetic, and charming (Dan Fogler, Alison Sudol). And sometimes it was bland and forgettable (Eddie Redmayne, Katherine Waterston).

I liked parts of it a lot. Even parts with wildly different tones and plots worked for me (even if they didn't necessarily work well together). In the end, however, it felt like a lot of potential and a lot of wasted opportunities. I think there could have been two really good films here, instead of one that was simply okay.

I liked more than I disliked and there's definitely a lot of material left here to build a film franchise on (as they're planning to do). Unfortunately a horrible casting decision sucked out a good deal of my enthusiasm. That character reveal evoked laughter from the audience at my theater and *not* in a good way. It's the worst misstep in a movie that wasn't exactly perfect to begin.

It was an entertaining movie and it was not a bad movie. I'd recommend it to fans of the Harry Potter universe for sure. I was mostly left wishing it had been better but I didn't regret having seen it.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

3

millionsknivesNov 23, 2016

With no direction, a focus on spells for the sake of showing CGI, a wealth of material that should have been left on the cutting room floor, and an impactless reveal — Fantastic Beasts is an aimless direction that can even bore a Harry Potter fan.

4 of 9 users found this helpful45

All this user's reviews

7

TVJerryNov 23, 2016

Eddie Redmayne plays the slightly-eccentric Brit who travels to 20s New York with a suitcase full of magical creatures. Naturally, they escape and all manner of mayhem ensues. The visual effects are remarkable and the beasts are trulyEddie Redmayne plays the slightly-eccentric Brit who travels to 20s New York with a suitcase full of magical creatures. Naturally, they escape and all manner of mayhem ensues. The visual effects are remarkable and the beasts are truly fantastic. On the other hand, the story isn't especially inventive and the direction lacks personality. Even Redmayne resorts to the gawky, awkward style that's often apparent in his work. While there are clever moments and a few mildly enjoyable characters, it's just a noisy, jumbled disarray by the end. The overall effect is visually dazzling and fun to watch, but not especially captivating on a human level.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

8

shoulderoforionNov 23, 2016

What a great grown up Wizarding world movie, I'm not a Potterhead, but liked the books & movies ... this gives me, more of that, plus I really really liked the characters. Not the same as HP, but different in a great way. Look forward to more.

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

8

43in2014Nov 23, 2016

Related media: I have watched all of the previous seven Harry Potter films but have not read any of the books, including the Fantastic Beasts book.

What's it like?: It's like the first Harry Potter film, where they introduce the World ofRelated media: I have watched all of the previous seven Harry Potter films but have not read any of the books, including the Fantastic Beasts book.

What's it like?: It's like the first Harry Potter film, where they introduce the World of Wizardry, its magic, human characters and animals, combined with the horrifying world of witch-hunting in the old US of A.

Pros:
1) As promised by the title, there are some fantastic beasts! 2) The film also brings the world of Harry Potter, its magic, human characters and animals, back into our consciousness again, but it is going in a totally different direction, and that is interesting and original.

Cons:
1) The obvious villain in the film, a very destructive force, could be better presented towards the end of the film. As in Alien and Jaws, less is more. There was too much of it in the film, yet it felt insufficiently explained. This part here could be shortened by few minutes. (Note: There is a less obvious villain in the film.)
3) Johnny Depp's casting in this film felt like an attempt to promote his flagging career.

How would the the different age groups rate it?
Children: (The film is not rated for children.)
Teens: Excellent
Young adults: Good
Medium age adults: Good
Old adults: Good

Rating: 4/5 (no half scores). It is worth spending your money and watching it in the cinemas.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

8

marcmyworksNov 22, 2016

Fantastic Beasts is a thrill ride full of monster, witches, wizards and the American laws of magic. Inspired by JK Rowling's book of the same name, this is more of a North American based prequel of the Harry Potter films, and though it startsFantastic Beasts is a thrill ride full of monster, witches, wizards and the American laws of magic. Inspired by JK Rowling's book of the same name, this is more of a North American based prequel of the Harry Potter films, and though it starts slow it builds into a wonderfully complex movie filled with themes of politics and animal rescue. Eddie Redmayne is wonderful as the awkward Newt as is Dan Fogler who plays his No-Maj (human) friend Jacob.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

0

AxeTNov 22, 2016

rating = 4 (Metacritic continued incompetence!)
Don't know why I saw this except for something local to do and the title itself. I've only seen two in the series in the theatre (or at all), the first and the one released summer 2009 (draggedrating = 4 (Metacritic continued incompetence!)
Don't know why I saw this except for something local to do and the title itself. I've only seen two in the series in the theatre (or at all), the first and the one released summer 2009 (dragged by girl), and I didn't get either one. However I know they are loved by so many and are faithfully rendered adaptations.
Seeing this one which is of high production value of course and is as expected in tone, content, formulaic payoff and such; I finally have come to accept something: I don't like fantasies. Old Disney fare, "Star Wars", the first "Lord of the Rings" film and "Game of Thrones" are practically the only exceptions.… Expand

4 of 10 users found this helpful46

All this user's reviews

4

dr_heartlessNov 22, 2016

Painfully bland and full of wasted potential. The movie's "dark" tone is totally unearned. Sure it looks dark, cribbing HARD from the last two Potter movies for music and tone. It really just comes down to the movie marketing itself as darkPainfully bland and full of wasted potential. The movie's "dark" tone is totally unearned. Sure it looks dark, cribbing HARD from the last two Potter movies for music and tone. It really just comes down to the movie marketing itself as dark when in reality this is a pretty lighthearted film. None of the dread and desperation that made the "Deathly Hallows" so memorable are present. The characters are flat. You get to know almost nothing about them and that do not grow or change at all. The story is constantly trying to throw twists at the audience but none of it matters anyway due to there never really being clear stakes. It all feels hallow. In fact the big twist at the end is so utterly ridiculous that I actually exclaimed "Oh come on" out loud in the theater. If you're okay with a brainless popcorn movie for the holidays this is perfect. There's some fun to be had for long time Potter fans but that's about it.… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

0

JuulJuupNov 22, 2016

I have to stay I'm disappointed in this movie. It's level of cliché really annoyed me at some parts.

To illustrate one scene which really got on my nerves (from memory): A scenario where a mind-reading witch randomly picks a photograph of aI have to stay I'm disappointed in this movie. It's level of cliché really annoyed me at some parts.

To illustrate one scene which really got on my nerves (from memory):
A scenario where a mind-reading witch randomly picks a photograph of a woman and asks the owner of the photograph who it is. He replied that he preferred if she didn't read his mind, followed by her comment "I see you're in pain.. She's a taker, you need a giver". Omg. Even if my friends would say this to me, it would annoy the **** out of me. There is no reference to this woman whatsoever through the complete movie, it's just filler garbage meant to sway the audience I think.

Normally I'm easily entertainment by any type of movie, but this really had me leave the cinema with a big frown of 'wtf'. To me, it resembled The Hobbit 2. Some humor, bad story telling. If you agree with me on that one, I'd recommend to skip this one.… Expand

3 of 8 users found this helpful35

All this user's reviews

4

rimpybharotNov 22, 2016

this comes as a blow to an ardent fan of Harry Potter series and Rowling's work. The average story is made even worse by David Yates by his sloppy excuse of a direction. Eddie Redmayne as an eccentric magizoologist is fine and so is Colinthis comes as a blow to an ardent fan of Harry Potter series and Rowling's work. The average story is made even worse by David Yates by his sloppy excuse of a direction. Eddie Redmayne as an eccentric magizoologist is fine and so is Colin Farrel, but the major disappointment is Katherine Waerston. She dilutes the whole energy of the movie. The movie depends heavily on the special effects but evryone who know Rowling knows the power of her story telling which blends perfectly with the magic surrounding the wizard world. Sadly, the movie has all show and no soul.… Expand

3 of 7 users found this helpful34

All this user's reviews

8

fool0117Nov 21, 2016

A pleasent revisit to the universe that JK Rowling created. I only wish they would have spent more time on character development than story. I can't wait to see more.

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

7

Jess_HillNov 21, 2016

This is a well crafted film with a dark edge and excellent creature design. Though long, it's well paced and doesn't drag, and the storyline is engaging and endearing, with the social commentary lacking subtlety but adding depth. TheThis is a well crafted film with a dark edge and excellent creature design. Though long, it's well paced and doesn't drag, and the storyline is engaging and endearing, with the social commentary lacking subtlety but adding depth. The performances are considered and generally polished, with Redmayne excellent as is to be expected. Definitely one for older children, this was better than I was expecting. 7.86/10… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

tsarouhasNov 21, 2016

The movie is so-so. The visuals were very pleasing (as expected) but the story is one huge mess...Nothing really happened. Don't expect action in this one

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

8

WaelNov 21, 2016

Set in the magical world of witchcraft, Fantastic Beasts is really worthy of the hype and the stir it's been causing for a almost a year now. The film itself is emotionally charged and action-packed, just like we've come to know everythingSet in the magical world of witchcraft, Fantastic Beasts is really worthy of the hype and the stir it's been causing for a almost a year now. The film itself is emotionally charged and action-packed, just like we've come to know everything Rowling has ever touched. With a great script from JK, great direction from David Yates, outstanding performances from the whole cast (Eddie Redmayne especially), and breath-taking visual effects, it's safe to say that this is the first journey of what looks like a franchise that will be up to the level of the pinnacle that is Harry Potter.… Expand

5 of 7 users found this helpful52

All this user's reviews

10

FrankSamNov 21, 2016

This film is the perfect expansion of the Harry Potter universe. Thanks to J.K. Rowling as the screenwriter and producer, and David Yates as the director, we can enjoy a very dark, mature and humorous film. Eddie Redmayne appears to be aThis film is the perfect expansion of the Harry Potter universe. Thanks to J.K. Rowling as the screenwriter and producer, and David Yates as the director, we can enjoy a very dark, mature and humorous film. Eddie Redmayne appears to be a flawless actor that can play any role. The soundtrack was very emotional and nostalgic: in fact we can notice an inspiration from the famous Hedwig's Them from Harry Potter. Moreover, the cinematography is fantastic and very detailed.… Expand

7 of 11 users found this helpful74

All this user's reviews

0

WaltexNov 21, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Boring, Disappointing, No Emotional Pull or Drive The areas around the eyes and cheeks of Eddie Redmayne don't seem to move throughout the whole movie, I think because he's trying so hard to put on a certain accent. He's not convincing in this role. Also the main female character is not someone one can easily connect with.

My favourite actors were the Newspaper Owner's son, the baker and the sister who's in love with the baker ... Colin Farrell was pretty good too.

Overall you don't end up caring much for any of the characters ... the only part that seemed to grip you is the part where the young man is about to be whipped for finding a wand. Also the bit where the baker goes into the rain was good too ... The line "gee I wish I was a wizard" from the trailer, is not featured in the movie. I was looking forward to seeing that bit.

The bit where Eddie says the baker is his friend at the end of the movie, I thought: what has he done to make you his friend? How have you shown each other that you are friends? The baker tried to hit you over the head with his suitcase, and now you're saying you're friends?

I liked that little platypus creature.

I like Eddie Redmayne, but he wasn't good in this movie ... you could see the acting and what I wanted was to feel him, to feel some genuine emotion.

I agree with another reviewer that says that Eddie mumbles his words and speaks with only a quarter of his mouth. That may be part of his character but it didn't help us follow what he was saying or connect with him ... I think all characters in movies, even if they are submissive or have self-doubt, should probably (in the main) pronounce their words clearly ... it's part of the joy of watching and listening to actors on the screen.

The start of the movie was great ,but it soon petered out into a boring flat movie, sorry.… Expand

3 of 9 users found this helpful36

All this user's reviews

0

isibisiNov 21, 2016

bad film, description of the characters (including evil) completely absent, more similar powers to a magneto that a potter, actors with a single expression.

3 of 16 users found this helpful313

All this user's reviews

3

FikashNov 21, 2016

As a fan of the series, I have to say that this movie was a huge disappointment. It is a huge bore. Eddie Redmayne as the lead was charmless and dull, and had seemingly no actual motivation throughout the whole film. His sidekick no-maj wasAs a fan of the series, I have to say that this movie was a huge disappointment. It is a huge bore. Eddie Redmayne as the lead was charmless and dull, and had seemingly no actual motivation throughout the whole film. His sidekick no-maj was just as uninteresting and seemed to be pulled along for the adventure for no apparent reason. The female leads were vastly more charming and I would have preferred if the movies centered on them. The film meanders for a good hour before getting to the actual plot, which is thin and offers no stakes for the characters we're meant to care about. The big "reveal" at the end was so obnoxious that it took everything I had to keep me from walking out of the theater. Just a very poorly-written film from start to finish. I'd wait for a rental on this one.… Expand

3 of 9 users found this helpful36

All this user's reviews

4

Praetorian333Nov 20, 2016

This film unfortunately contains none of the "heart" or emotion of the Harry Potter series. It simply feels like the empty husk of a film. There's nothing substantial about the characters without ham-handed exposition. I'm a massive fan ofThis film unfortunately contains none of the "heart" or emotion of the Harry Potter series. It simply feels like the empty husk of a film. There's nothing substantial about the characters without ham-handed exposition. I'm a massive fan of the HP universe, but this one just felt very flavorless to me. The actors fell flat, not due to their ability, but due to either poor writing or direction. Colin Farrell is completely wasted in this film, as are some other characters who could have been so much deeper. Overall, it's a letdown of a film that simply moseys from plot point to plot point, with little actual substance.… Expand

2 of 8 users found this helpful26

All this user's reviews

9

PerculaNov 20, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Well, this franchise certainly has my attention now or, let's say, once more. Fantastic Beasts is magic and the only flaw that gets to me might be a personal taste problem: The casting of Johnny Depp as Gellert Grindelwald, when actually the whole movie made me more and more interested not only in Colin Farrell's character but also his performance.… Expand

8 of 12 users found this helpful84

All this user's reviews

6

Rebecca31Nov 20, 2016

Are you a fan of Harry Potter? Do you miss Harry Potter? Has nothing filled the void since Harry Potter finished? Well then why not go see a movie that's not Harry Potter but is about wizards. Not starring any of your favourite characters butAre you a fan of Harry Potter? Do you miss Harry Potter? Has nothing filled the void since Harry Potter finished? Well then why not go see a movie that's not Harry Potter but is about wizards. Not starring any of your favourite characters but does star an awkward Eddie Redmayne stumbling around 1920s New York with a suitcase full of magical creatures. Joined by a no-maj (yeah they don't even use the term muggle) but you will hear the words Hogwarts and Dumbledore so there’s always that. The effects for the fantastic beasts really are quite magical and I can't fault the acting from anyone but I will fault the direction. Yes David Yates I'm talking to you. How you've managed to direct the last 4 Harry Potter movies and now the next 4 Fantastic Beasts movies I'll never know, you uncreative waste of space. The biggest problem is this movie has absolutely no heart and no real story, more like two badly paced stories shoved together in the last twenty minutes. Recommended but if you're expecting this to feel like a Harry Potter movie then you'd be better off watching any of those movies instead.… Expand

4 of 10 users found this helpful46

All this user's reviews

4

Brent_MarchantNov 20, 2016

The only thing fantastic about this one is the special effects. The story, writing and acting are all flat, meandering along with little direction, personality or qualities that make the picture even remotely interesting. I frankly couldn'tThe only thing fantastic about this one is the special effects. The story, writing and acting are all flat, meandering along with little direction, personality or qualities that make the picture even remotely interesting. I frankly couldn't wait for this one to end. Zzzzzzzz....… Expand

4 of 12 users found this helpful48

All this user's reviews

7

MrMovieBuffNov 20, 2016

'Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them' is the first screenwriting credit for "Harry Potter" author, J.K. Rowling, who plans on taking this beloved franchise and expanding it, since that is the current trend of Hollywood blockbusters, these'Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them' is the first screenwriting credit for "Harry Potter" author, J.K. Rowling, who plans on taking this beloved franchise and expanding it, since that is the current trend of Hollywood blockbusters, these days. Eddie Redmayne stars as Newt Scamander, a wizard employee at the Ministry of Magic who travels to New York. It's 1926, and Newt appears to be carrying around a case that seems to hold a living creature inside. He tries everything he can to retrieve the creature when it's escaped and starts to cause trouble, on the way, he runs into a man named Jacob Kowalski (Dan Fogler) that takes one of Newt's mysterious eggs when he leaves it behind. Meanwhile, a woman named Tina Goldstein (Katherine Waterston), another wizard is concerned that Newt may have let Jacob, who is a "No-Maj" - which is an American term for "Muggle", meaning non-magic humans - know too much about the wizard world, and his memory must be "Obliviated". But Jacob gets away with the egg, and Newt and Tina must get it back before more chaos ensues. Meanwhile, we meet a high-ranking Auror and Director of the Magical Security named Percival Graves (Colin Farrell) who appears to get close to a young boy named Credence Barebone (Ezra Miller) whose family seems to be holding some dark, magical secrets that Graves needs to know more about. Graves also discovers that there are some dark magic that invades the whole of New York, and it's up to Newt, Tina and Jacob to try and stop it. Seeing the few unlikely heroes reluctantly go on their unexpected journey together is fun and riveting, and the cast do an excellent job to get you invested in what might happen in future sequels... it appears that there will be four more movies to come out of this. The worst thing I can say about "Fantastic Beasts" is that, it's not "Harry Potter"... there is no young boy discovering the gifts of magic, there is little awe and it's not quite as whimsical. But, director David Yates - who directed the last four "Harry Potter" installments - keeps things balanced. The pacing of the story is a little uneven, as there are some amazing scenes where we discover a world of magical beasts, and there are some slow, scary and chilling moments about the dark magic. 'Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them' isn't necessarily exciting, but it has made me curious for where the characters might go in future sequels. Whether or not this will match or even surpass the quality of the "Harry Potter" franchise, we will never know. But, if you watch it as a franchise on its own terms, it's still good! I liked the characters, I liked the creatures, I liked the new story... this is a franchise that should get more attention.… Expand

6 of 10 users found this helpful64

All this user's reviews

9

PhamAnhTuanNov 19, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Everything is great from the story to the CGI effects. The twist, the acting,... are great too. Its a nice Spin-off from the Harry Potter's franchise but the film is kinda not as good as i expected ,there are some plot holes and the ending is not perfect at all, The antagonist isnt bad at all he has a great ideology but the way he did it, which is wrong in many levels, the other one is seemed to be very powerful but in the end the MACUSA easily kill him within 30s - I mean what the f*ck , i thought there would be a lot of magical fight scences . That are the down-side of the film. In the end this film is very good and enoyable . Im looking forward to the sequel in 2018.… Expand

5 of 8 users found this helpful53

All this user's reviews

10

DobbyTheFreeElfNov 19, 2016

I really like this movie! BEST MOVIE IN 2016! Great acting. The beasts are fantastic. There’s nothing inherently wrong with that. But the picture — directed by David Yates, who also gave us the last four Harry Potter films, terrific ones —I really like this movie! BEST MOVIE IN 2016! Great acting. The beasts are fantastic. There’s nothing inherently wrong with that. But the picture — directed by David Yates, who also gave us the last four Harry Potter films, terrific ones — feels both sprawling and crowded, as if it were trying to pack too much mythology into one cramped crawlspace. Fantastic Beasts is a prequel, set years before Harry Potter was even a zigzag-lightning-scar-shaped gleam in his parents’ eye: it’s 1920s New York, and Newt Scamander (Eddie Redmayne), a “magizoologist” with insider knowledge of all sorts of magical creatures, is just arriving from London. Stateside, it’s a troubled and troubling time: the underground wizarding community is under threat, because a whirling black whatchamacallit has been forging a path of destruction through the New York City streets. To protect their ranks, the wizards must take great care to hide their powers from the No-Majs (the American term for Muggles). It doesn’t help that a fanatical group, led by Samantha Morton’s demonically prim Mary Lou Barebone, is out to break the wizards’ ranks apart. Also, dark wizard Gellert Grindelwald has gone missing—in case you happen to find that Fantastic Beasts doesn’t have enough plot points for you to digest.

Into this mess steps Scamander, hoping to research some new magical beasts and protect some that have become endangered. He happens to carry a number of such creatures in his mystically bottomless suitcase (more on that later), though their misbehavior ends up landing him, and the new friends he makes, in a great deal of trouble. Those misadventures involve an earnest, friendly No-Maj and aspiring baker, Jacob Kowalski (Dan Fogler); Tina Goldstein (Katharine Waterston), a “Statute of Secrecy” enforcer who misperceives what Scamander is up to and tries to turn him in to the wizarding officials; and Tina’s sister, Queenie (Alison Sudol), a charming flapper-girl who can read minds as efficiently as a voracious grade-school reader tearing her way through all seven Harry Potter books.

There’s so much going on in Fantastic Beasts that after the first act, you almost can’t be bothered to care what happens next. In the movie’s world, there’s a magical explanation for everything, which means story logic too often gets left by the wayside. (In the Harry Potter books, Rowling did a remarkable job of making magical logic seem consistent and believable, and the movie adaptations followed suit; that clarity has been lost here.) And even though the movie preaches tolerance, its ideas never quite jell. Still, Yates and Rowling are intent on working their charm on us, and some of it sticks: If Redmayne’s performance is just too adorably mannered, Fogler and Sudol twirl through their roles like dance-floor champs — both have low-key, breezy allure.… Expand

9 of 14 users found this helpful95

All this user's reviews

1

chiriacvalentinNov 19, 2016

Eddie Redmayne english needs subtitles. I'm not a native english, so I couldn't understand anything he says in the movie. He speaks with shortcuts, half words and arhaisms, regionalisms pronounced with quarter mouth. For 2 hours I waited forEddie Redmayne english needs subtitles. I'm not a native english, so I couldn't understand anything he says in the movie. He speaks with shortcuts, half words and arhaisms, regionalisms pronounced with quarter mouth. For 2 hours I waited for the movie to start. I couldn't understand anything of the story.… Expand

5 of 17 users found this helpful512

All this user's reviews

7

yezoNov 19, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This movie is okay, a lot of expectations from the movie but I was not as satisfied. The plot is ok. Some CGI is good, some is pathetic, particularly at the end, the farewell of Newt and the thunder bird, the CGI is so bad.
A lot of stuff was not quite make sense, I feel like there was a bit of rush about the orphanage, and constant cut scenes from Newt and Tina then to orphanage does not quite connect. At the end, I kinda of feel like Grindelwald might show up base on those newspaper headlines earlier. But Johnny Depp, wtf, I was expecting someone from Bulgaria or Russia.
The aims and objective for Grindelwald is not well explained, and c'mon man, the greatest dark wizard at that time, got defeated in no time.
But I have to declare I have not read the book yet.… Expand

5 of 8 users found this helpful53

All this user's reviews

6

TheMetacritiqerNov 19, 2016

It's nothing compared to the best Harry Potters. What about the not so good ones? I forget, I saw them years ago. Theirs no sense of mystery or punch to the confrontations. And it could be a little shorter. It takes way too long to end. A lotIt's nothing compared to the best Harry Potters. What about the not so good ones? I forget, I saw them years ago. Theirs no sense of mystery or punch to the confrontations. And it could be a little shorter. It takes way too long to end. A lot of it is a comedy that's not funny. Except for the platypus creature in the beginning when he's shaked and all the gold comes out his pouch. But I did actually like Katherine Waterston's character. Four more of these? Ridiculous.… Expand

1 of 6 users found this helpful15

All this user's reviews

10

moothemagiccowNov 19, 2016

We're no longer seeing 500 page books pared down to 2 hour compromises. Rowling is working within the medium and allowed to flourish. For the first time, I'm seeing her work portrayed on film and not knowing exactly what to expect.
I'm oldWe're no longer seeing 500 page books pared down to 2 hour compromises. Rowling is working within the medium and allowed to flourish. For the first time, I'm seeing her work portrayed on film and not knowing exactly what to expect.
I'm old and jaded, but this film delivered a true sense of wonder to me. Rowling's magic is just like what she put in her books. It's funny and intriguing. It's odd. It starts from an unlikely place but manages to get all the way to deep issues of society and self.… Expand

8 of 13 users found this helpful85

All this user's reviews

6

dtlNov 19, 2016

A generally enjoyable film, it looks good (but not great) and the cast works well together. The story on the other hand seemed often aimless and overly bogged down. Honestly, I don't understand why this is the story they decided to go withA generally enjoyable film, it looks good (but not great) and the cast works well together. The story on the other hand seemed often aimless and overly bogged down. Honestly, I don't understand why this is the story they decided to go with when expanding the Harry Potter world. That said, the story was neither overly confusing nor overly simple, and I expect that Rowling could do a good job in future scripts. The world itself seemed well put together, if a bit off-putting. Rowling doesn't seem to find much to like in her vision of American Wizardry, though I imagine in future movies we would find more nuance in that area. Additionally, I am not a fan of period pieces, and those who do may find it slightly more enjoyable.… Expand

1 of 6 users found this helpful15

All this user's reviews

1

marco34laNov 19, 2016

I'm sorry. Unless you're an avid fan of the books, you will find this movie on par with a g-rated idiotic movie made for 7 year old children. I loved Harry Potter. This movie was a total and complete snooze-fest for the first 60mins. It'sI'm sorry. Unless you're an avid fan of the books, you will find this movie on par with a g-rated idiotic movie made for 7 year old children. I loved Harry Potter. This movie was a total and complete snooze-fest for the first 60mins. It's just plain nonsense. I forced myself not to walk out. When I finally left, i saw that the 2 guys in their 20s sitting behind me were fast asleep.… Expand

5 of 21 users found this helpful516

All this user's reviews

10

dspratlinNov 19, 2016

What’s it about?

Eccentric magizoologist Newt Scamander (Eddie Redmayne) misplaces an enchanted suitcase in 1920s New York. An extremely profitable franchise is unleashed. What did I think? Hey, you guys like Harry Potter? Then I’ve gotWhat’s it about?

Eccentric magizoologist Newt Scamander (Eddie Redmayne) misplaces an enchanted suitcase in 1920s New York. An extremely profitable franchise is unleashed.

What did I think?

Hey, you guys like Harry Potter? Then I’ve got good news: Fantastic Beasts is the worthy spin-off that you’re going to be really into for the next ten years or so. While it’s darker than the original films, it’s packed with subtle little nods to them that fans will adore, and the story (though somewhat complicated) is good enough to stand alone. It’s tremendous fun to see the wizarding world through a 1920s lens – magical speakeasy, anyone? – and the inhabitants of Scamander’s Pokeball-meets-TARDIS suitcase are just as fantastic as advertised. This film will frighten young children, but everyone else will be thoroughly enchanted.… Expand

20 of 35 users found this helpful2015

All this user's reviews

7

busbfranNov 19, 2016

Fantastic Beasts is a fun adventure set in the magical word that we have ALL come to love! However this spin off fails to capture the raw amazement the originals did. Mediocre performances, hit & miss dialogue really flat line the moviesFantastic Beasts is a fun adventure set in the magical word that we have ALL come to love! However this spin off fails to capture the raw amazement the originals did. Mediocre performances, hit & miss dialogue really flat line the movies overall quality. Unfortunately this magical world may have already surpassed its hay days.… Expand

8 of 12 users found this helpful84

All this user's reviews

4

familyguyNov 19, 2016

What the hell with Eddie Redmayne? Entire a film he only have 1 boring expression. Is that how 2 times oscar nominated and 1 win acting. His performance like this film is the pain in the ass and he just want to go home soon after work hour.What the hell with Eddie Redmayne? Entire a film he only have 1 boring expression. Is that how 2 times oscar nominated and 1 win acting. His performance like this film is the pain in the ass and he just want to go home soon after work hour. Seriously they should more screen time on Colin farrel… Expand

1 of 6 users found this helpful15

All this user's reviews

0

MaldororNov 18, 2016

The movie is not bad, but a lot of special effects does not make it "metamodern" (we would like to see something new after so many years of simulation and chopped narrative), it goes without saying that the narrative form has been able to doThe movie is not bad, but a lot of special effects does not make it "metamodern" (we would like to see something new after so many years of simulation and chopped narrative), it goes without saying that the narrative form has been able to do it. There were moments when the audience were shocked by some of the typecasting, but they have hit the nail on the head when selected D. In my opinion, Eddie Redmayne is still attached to the characters of "The Danish Girl" and "Stephen Hawking's Universe", the same looks from under his eyebrows, the same female timidity of "The Danish Girl". And again my favorite "But", this film is worth your time, "bon appetit".… Expand

6 of 25 users found this helpful619

All this user's reviews

Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them

User Reviews