Beauty and the Beast

10

marriedthecritcApr 3, 2017

Disney had a challenge bringing the animated classic "Beauty and the Beast" into the 21st century. Overall they did a fantastic job bringing the story and music to life. The music in contrast to the 1991 classic is fuller in sound and has aDisney had a challenge bringing the animated classic "Beauty and the Beast" into the 21st century. Overall they did a fantastic job bringing the story and music to life. The music in contrast to the 1991 classic is fuller in sound and has a stronger impact. The clear use of auto tune while not too everyone's taste does not take away from the experience. The cast choices are spot on. Emma Watson had a insurmountable task of capturing belle and she does bring all the required emotions to the role. Other notable cast such as Emma Thompson had a great spin on the Angela Lansbury classic that was Mrs. Potts. Ultimately all Disney had to do was take the emotional journey that was the original; amplify it, and modernize it.They achieved that as apparent by the drones of people who are seeings and enjoying this film.… Expand

11 of 13 users found this helpful112

All this user's reviews

10

theadamphobiaApr 3, 2017

This Movie Is Really Amazing So I Closed My Eyes Cause Nothing Else Was Worth Seeing And Than I Broke My Leg Cause I Was Not Looking. So Please Subscribe

13 of 16 users found this helpful133

All this user's reviews

5

RobBob99Apr 2, 2017

This is a tough film for me to judge. There isn't anything downright bad about the film. It's beautiful to look at and the cast members are all solid in their roles. However, I never found myself thinking that this film needed to be made andThis is a tough film for me to judge. There isn't anything downright bad about the film. It's beautiful to look at and the cast members are all solid in their roles. However, I never found myself thinking that this film needed to be made and nothing about it really built on the existing mythology that enhanced it. Take the 2015 Cinderella, while it was a recreation of the original, the filmmakers made the characters stronger and built on the story to make it a more solid movie. That really isn't done here that's impactful to the story and in the end, it did just feel like a recreation of a great movie.… Expand

3 of 6 users found this helpful33

All this user's reviews

8

johnetteweberApr 2, 2017

Beauty and the Beast was very well done. I thought that the movie stayed exceptionally close to the original Disney cartoon. I loved that they had all of the same songs with a few bonus ones. Most of the acting was very good. The reason IBeauty and the Beast was very well done. I thought that the movie stayed exceptionally close to the original Disney cartoon. I loved that they had all of the same songs with a few bonus ones. Most of the acting was very good. The reason I gave it an 8 was that I didn't care for Beast, and the awkwardness of the Gaston and Lefou relationship, otherwise outstanding job from Disney.… Expand

12 of 15 users found this helpful123

All this user's reviews

8

lisaloo76Apr 2, 2017

I actually loved this remake. Nothing is as good as the original. However, I believe this is pretty close to the animated version. The outcry of a gay character in this movie was much ado about nothing. LeFou had feminine characteristics, butI actually loved this remake. Nothing is as good as the original. However, I believe this is pretty close to the animated version. The outcry of a gay character in this movie was much ado about nothing. LeFou had feminine characteristics, but nothing obvious. Overall, I felt the casting was right on point as far as Gaston, Maurice and Beast. I do agree that Jack Black would have made the perfect LeFou though! Emma Watson did her best, but unfortunately for most people, she will always be Hermione from Harry Potter.… Expand

4 of 5 users found this helpful41

All this user's reviews

10

BasaureApr 1, 2017

Standing on its own it's a great movie with great performances. An awesome take on a timeless classic, supported with social awareness and profound subtext and ad hoc to 2017.

2 of 9 users found this helpful27

All this user's reviews

0

TrunkisApr 1, 2017

An sjw hit piece.

The movie is so bogged down in politics that everything good about gets drown on it.

Waste of screen time, an insult to the classic disney movie.

13 of 27 users found this helpful1314

All this user's reviews

0

hgoonApr 1, 2017

It was a blatant SJW propaganda film, which should have been expected from an emma Watson lead. Some glowing moments that inevitably get dragged through the mud with forced political correctness.

9 of 20 users found this helpful911

All this user's reviews

4

Nkond39Mar 29, 2017

Ok. Live-action version of "Beauty and the Beast". What works in a cartoon, does NOT work in live-action.
You all know the story, we got this Prince dude. He's like all shallow and superficial and only likes pretty girls. And the supposedOk. Live-action version of "Beauty and the Beast". What works in a cartoon, does NOT work in live-action.
You all know the story, we got this Prince dude. He's like all shallow and superficial and only likes pretty girls. And the supposed message of the movie is that true beauty lies inside. Which is actually crap in and of itself, but let's not delve into that right now. How this movie goes about delivering that message about inner beauty? First, Beautiful Enchantress. Has to be beautiful. Cause if it was ugly enchantress that turned Prince into Beast, that's just cruel. But if she's beautiful then she must be kind and it all must be some kinda lesson. Next. The Beast. Oh come on! You call THAT "The Beast"?! Its a goddamn big fluffy anthropomorphic lion with cute horns. An animated Beast was scarier! There is no real challenge in falling in love with him once he stops being a total dickwad. Enchantress should've turned him into a friggin Alien monster! See if Belle could drop a kiss on that mucus dripping mug! And anyway. Are we teaching Belle about importance of inner beauty? The Belle. Ok. So the main reason for Enchantress to put a spell on The Beast was to teach him a lesson that a pretty face is not all that important and all that "don't judge the book by its cover" crap. Enter Emma Watson. Come on! I would read through any book with that kinda cover! Even if it was full with boring "data reconfiguration and statistical analysis" reports! What kind of a lesson is The Beast learning? That if you are:
1. Big and powerful
2. Own a castle
3. Not a total jerk (this is why its a fairy tale, in real life if you got the fist two covered, you can be a jerk)
Then you still get the pretty girl, even if you got a "setback" of looking like a big cute lion with curly horns. Anyway, you still turn into pretty boy after she plops a smoochie on your hairy face.
What is the lesson learned here? Come on, really? To really get the message across, Belle should've been the fugliest girl in the village, and The Beast should've stayed in beastly form, no matter how many kisses.
That stuff should've remained animated! Was way easier to suspend disbelief.… Expand

3 of 8 users found this helpful35

All this user's reviews

7

FlexedacornMar 29, 2017

I went into the theater with tempered expectations as the original animated film is one of my favorites. I was NOT disappointed and left the theater genuinely happy. It is for the most part the exact same story, with some slight alterationsI went into the theater with tempered expectations as the original animated film is one of my favorites. I was NOT disappointed and left the theater genuinely happy. It is for the most part the exact same story, with some slight alterations to add more character development to Belle and her Father. Much like most Disney live action films the casting was spot. My personal favorites were the amazing chemistry between Josh Gad as LeFou and Luke Evans as Gaston. The film is a must see for fans of the original or for those who are looking for a good family oriented film.… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

8

Truth_of_PiscesMar 28, 2017

A faithful adaption of the classic original that adds enough of it's own original nuances and story elements to set itself apart, and is sure to please fans of the original and members of the new generation experiencing this classic tale forA faithful adaption of the classic original that adds enough of it's own original nuances and story elements to set itself apart, and is sure to please fans of the original and members of the new generation experiencing this classic tale for the first time.… Expand

8 of 12 users found this helpful84

All this user's reviews

6

MattBrady99Mar 28, 2017

"Forever can spare a minute."

The best way to describe 2017 "Beauty and the Beast" is the same thing I said about Cinderella (2015). If you seen the 1991 version then you've seen the new one already. To be fair, I liked this movie way more"Forever can spare a minute."

The best way to describe 2017 "Beauty and the Beast" is the same thing I said about Cinderella (2015). If you seen the 1991 version then you've seen the new one already.

To be fair, I liked this movie way more than Cinderella. Just the musical numbers and the stellar voice acting was one of the highlights of the film. Sir Ian McKellen and Ewan McGregor both steal the show.

Oh and if Josh Gad isn't the worst or annoying part of your movie, then you done something right. He's was pretty damn in this. Same thing with Luke Evens as the cartoon villain which fitted nicely in this type of universe.

While I still prefer the idea of the Beast being more practical rather than CGI, but Dan Stevens still gave a solid performance as the character.

Beside the obvious set designs and noticeable autotune, it's visually stunning and had an old fairly tale vibe to it. This is the closest thing we got that almost re-captures the magic of the 1991 film.

I had a lot of fun with this live adaptation. What's not so fun is the next live adaptations lined up. Like, seriously Disney? Well it's gonna make money anyway.… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

8

Myers05Mar 28, 2017

I absolutely loved this movie! I grew up watching Beauty and the Beast and other Disney movies, so it was fun to see it remade as a live action film. It was like watching my childhood on the big screen. I recommend this movie to any Disney fans.

8 of 11 users found this helpful83

All this user's reviews

8

Compi24Mar 25, 2017

Sure, the Beast's CGI looks a bit wonky from time to time. Sure, the handful of new songs don't exactly land as hard as the greatest hits do. And sure, a tad of the original's warmth and endearment may have gotten lost in the shuffle. But, asSure, the Beast's CGI looks a bit wonky from time to time. Sure, the handful of new songs don't exactly land as hard as the greatest hits do. And sure, a tad of the original's warmth and endearment may have gotten lost in the shuffle. But, as far as being a live-action remake of one of the greatest animated films of all time is concerned, Bill Condon's "Beauty And The Beast" does what it needs to do. It offers an updated, yet appropriate visual interpretation of the whimsical fairy tale at hand. It references and pays respectful homage to the many iconicisms that made the 1991 original so unforgettable. And, most importantly, it still maintains a level fun and enjoyment that can at least hold an anthropomorphic candle to that of all Disney classics. Indeed, this might actually be Disney's finest live-action remake yet, in my completely subjective opinion. Color me surprised.… Expand

3 of 9 users found this helpful36

All this user's reviews

6

stsieteMar 18, 2017

La mayor parte de lo que meten nuevo sobra, y algunos cambios(ejem GASTON ejem) son una cagada, a los objetos con CGI abusivo les falta carisma, con todo y con esto me gusta bastante como desarrollan la relación entre bella y bestia. PuesLa mayor parte de lo que meten nuevo sobra, y algunos cambios(ejem GASTON ejem) son una cagada, a los objetos con CGI abusivo les falta carisma, con todo y con esto me gusta bastante como desarrollan la relación entre bella y bestia. Pues eso, otro remake.… Expand

3 of 15 users found this helpful312

All this user's reviews

10

AlaaARahmanMar 27, 2017

The live action version of Beauty and the Beast is a remarkable movie, with a lot of roses blooming with every scene played out. The cast was spot on, the VFX was remarkable, the music was nothing short of brilliant and the nostalgia was justThe live action version of Beauty and the Beast is a remarkable movie, with a lot of roses blooming with every scene played out. The cast was spot on, the VFX was remarkable, the music was nothing short of brilliant and the nostalgia was just right. This movie cannot be of course compared to the original because it stands out from its original material and delivers its own magic.The remake has its own magic, humour, elegance and hype. This is a beautifully crafted movie, with an incredible soul to it and a heart that is beastly in its grandeur, humor, romance and nostalgia.… Expand

8 of 11 users found this helpful83

All this user's reviews

7

Creeper3455Mar 27, 2017

Don't say that is better than the animated movie,because it's not. But at least is enjoyable and fun. I was almost scared of how could t be when the movie began,because from one song to another, it felt like a Broadway musical,but after theDon't say that is better than the animated movie,because it's not. But at least is enjoyable and fun. I was almost scared of how could t be when the movie began,because from one song to another, it felt like a Broadway musical,but after the 1st act, it turns (luckily) into the same old Disney musical. When the visual effects started to roll out, it was impressive,but when the Beast (played greatly by Dan Stevens) appeared, some of the moments were fine. With the addition of some never seen-before scenes, it felt like the movie was going to a dark and emotional turn. Everything felt like that, but when we get into the last act, everything was like it came out from a comedy.The performances were all great and, as i expected, Emma Watson shined as Belle and Luke Evans dominated the comedy of this movie alongside Josh Gad,aside from being a total badass. In the end, this live action remake is NOT better than the animated, but it manages to deliver a promising story, some touching moments, great acting and solid visual effects.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

10

sdruleyMar 26, 2017

If you are tone deaf or have no appreciation for raw talent, then you may not prefer this movie. Otherwise, in my 74 years on this planet, this is the best movie I have ever seen. Full of passion, feeling, love, emotion and an excitingIf you are tone deaf or have no appreciation for raw talent, then you may not prefer this movie. Otherwise, in my 74 years on this planet, this is the best movie I have ever seen. Full of passion, feeling, love, emotion and an exciting storyline to bring it together. Ms. Watson nailed the performance. She is truly beautiful, gifted and feels the story with class.… Expand

9 of 12 users found this helpful93

All this user's reviews

7

Iky009Mar 26, 2017

There is a scary visual beauty, effects that hypnotize and capture the essence of the animated classic, and a magnificent soundtrack. It is a fact to say that Beauty and the Beast is a beautiful film you see (visually), but your visualThere is a scary visual beauty, effects that hypnotize and capture the essence of the animated classic, and a magnificent soundtrack. It is a fact to say that Beauty and the Beast is a beautiful film you see (visually), but your visual mastery is just a part of something that could be much more memorable, than just a beautiful and helpful film. Bela and Fera are back in action in a live-action adventure that will delight the new generation and nostalgia for what has grown with the animated classic.… Expand

0 of 5 users found this helpful05

All this user's reviews

7

thedaywalkerMar 26, 2017

Thought it was pretty decent, there are moments where you can really smile, but also moments i couldn't help but to role my eyes. They were faithful to the original story, which is good, but too faithful, some of the singing could have beenThought it was pretty decent, there are moments where you can really smile, but also moments i couldn't help but to role my eyes. They were faithful to the original story, which is good, but too faithful, some of the singing could have been cut off, and it would have worked better, like in the Jungle Book. The performances were really good, specially Luke Evans as Gaston, he really incorporated that, the scenery was beautiful and the ending really enjoyable… Expand

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

1

LionaeronMar 25, 2017

It's a stinker, let me save you money and time, the original animation is far superior in charm, character design and plot pacing. I give one point for the music that isn't original.

8 of 18 users found this helpful810

All this user's reviews

10

kuehnauMar 25, 2017

A faithful readapation of the Disney classic, they still managed to add extra weight to the story without disrupting what made it a classic to begin with. The movie covers what you'd expect it to, while explaining the main character's backA faithful readapation of the Disney classic, they still managed to add extra weight to the story without disrupting what made it a classic to begin with. The movie covers what you'd expect it to, while explaining the main character's back story. I was under the impression that there had been some backlash due to one of Disney's first gay characters. The implication is there, but it's handled in the perfect way, where many people may miss it altogether unless they are deliberately keeping an eye out for it. Conservative parents parents, no need to worry, the film isn't going to turn your child gay. I could write pages on how this movie is great and why, but I'll just say this, it's a good movie, go see it.… Expand

5 of 12 users found this helpful57

All this user's reviews

0

bethanyrobbenMar 22, 2017

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Emma Watson does not have the warmth of Belle in her expressions, the added new songs are unnecessary, as well as certain scenes, such as the enchantress, how the prince became a Beast, how Belle's mother died, etc. Also, Luke Evans is handsome to many, but to me, he's not Gaston; he's not intimidating like the character was in the original. The CGI is pretty awful, Mrs. Potts & Chip look horrible, but Beast looks the worst. He looks like a man who has grown extra hair on his face; & people have compared his horns to those of a goat's. I think they changed his character, because he's not scary as Beast in this live-action version. I'm also not impressed with Emma Watson's yellow dress which is supposed to be Belle's, but looks horrible compared to the original, it does not have a full skirt & has a different design on the top; the sleeves are also nothing like the original. The other costumes were well-made. I don't like Ariana Grande & John Legend's version of "Tale as Old as Time", I feel they should've chosen someone else to sing it. The only good things I can say about it are the costumes (except the yellow dress) & the set design, the scenery was beautiful! But as for everything else, this does absolutely no justice to the original.… Expand

13 of 25 users found this helpful1312

All this user's reviews

9

LegendPotatoMar 25, 2017

A touching story by disney and well directed, this movie was better than i hoped. It had some flaws, too much cgi for my taste but in a beautifully designed environment. Great performance by the leads and that was some good singing.

2 of 8 users found this helpful26

All this user's reviews

6

Rebecca31Mar 24, 2017

A tale as old as time, honestly I wished it had stayed that way. There’s no question that the animated version is better than this remake, but sure we all knew that already didn’t we? From her opening song Emma Watson seemed horribly miscast,A tale as old as time, honestly I wished it had stayed that way. There’s no question that the animated version is better than this remake, but sure we all knew that already didn’t we? From her opening song Emma Watson seemed horribly miscast, her voice auto tuned to within an inch of its life was very disappointing, however as the story progressed she did manage to win me over. Her relationship with the Beast felt genuine and there was strong chemistry between Watson and Dan Stevens. Luke Evans was a definite show stealer, perfectly channelling the essence of Gaston and perhaps the best thing in the entire movie. The only character that didn’t seem to live up to the standard was Ewan McGregor and his horrendous attempt at a French accent and if you thought listening to a bad French accent was annoying you should hear him sing with it. Cringe.
But why oh why Disney did you feel the need to add mediocre songs to an otherwise perfect set list? There is one additional song in particular and if you’ve seen the movie then you know what I’m talking about. It was unbelievably out of place and upset the pace of the movie. So unfortunately for me this disrupting the pace of the story happened too often and I was left sitting there thinking the animated version is a far superior movie and the only reason for this remake is the money which is has certainly made in buckets.
We all know the story and what should have been a dramatic and emotional last act was simply bland. There was no emotion so although I did enjoy a lot of this movie it’s just not as good as it should have been. For all the diehard Disney fans there’s no recommendation because no doubt you’ve already seen this but for everyone else maybe watch the animated version instead.… Expand

5 of 12 users found this helpful57

All this user's reviews

8

SEROJMar 24, 2017

I waited for this movie pretty much since its reveal. When i was a kid, i used to rent the original animated version. So i was afraid that my childhood could be ruined with this one. Absolutely not! I am shocked to see all these low scores.I waited for this movie pretty much since its reveal. When i was a kid, i used to rent the original animated version. So i was afraid that my childhood could be ruined with this one. Absolutely not! I am shocked to see all these low scores. For me - it was an amazing experience. I had lots of nostalgic,emotional and fun moments. I felt that there ware some unnecessary jokes, Gaston was a bit polite in the beginning but the most important thing was that the plot now explains a lot of unasnwered questions from the original animation (no spoilers). The acting could be better, the soundtracks are legendary and overall i think it was an amazing movie!… Expand

4 of 10 users found this helpful46

All this user's reviews

5

NerdConsultantMar 24, 2017

So, where do I stand with Beauty and the Beast, because this is one of the more complicated films of the year for me. Well, on the one hand I like the fact that it’s a nice re-creation of the original film, which I enjoyed. The downside isSo, where do I stand with Beauty and the Beast, because this is one of the more complicated films of the year for me. Well, on the one hand I like the fact that it’s a nice re-creation of the original film, which I enjoyed. The downside is that that is also its biggest weakness. It doesn’t really feel like a new film, it just feels like a repeat, which would be fine for a stage show, but not an entire movie. Especially considering that Jungle Book and Cinderella did a much better job updating their stories. I get a sense that Beauty and the Beast has not been around long enough to really warrant an update since the original one still holds up, there are not that many issues with it and it narratively is still as relevant now as it was upon its release in the 1990’s and it’s so evident here, every moment you are seeing something that is in the original film, you are getting a sense that it was done much better there and it really makes you feel that the minor changes and additions feel like they detract from the film more than they add. Again, it’s not to say it’s bad. The actors do a decent job, the effects are pretty good and the set design is fantastic, I expect to be seeing this film nominated in several of the technical categories at next year’s Oscars. However, to me, it just feels rather ‘been there, done that, and it was much better the first time’. I don’t hate this movie, in fact, I kind of like it on a few levels and I wouldn’t object to seeing it again as I suspect this is probably going to become a mainstay of British TV at Christmas. However, I can’t fully recommend Beauty and the Best, especially if you enjoyed the first film. It’s worth it for curiosity and you will get a good film for the price value, but you are not getting a great film… Expand

4 of 10 users found this helpful46

All this user's reviews

9

Sassypants25Mar 24, 2017

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. An EXCELLENT adaptation of the mixture of original story, Disney animated feature, and stage musical. The effectiveness in the live-action retelling occurs when many of the "plot holes" and issues are addressed. Where is Belle's mother? What happened exactly with the Enchantress? Whey doesn't ANYONE ever wander ove rto the castle? All of these (and more) are addressed intelligently and thoughtfully. The story never feels forced or rushed and the songs are woven seamlessly into the story. The newer songs don't add as much as those from the stage version, but it's understandable why the newer mater is in the film. They are shorter and really move the narrative along. The performances by Dan Stevens (Beast) and Emma Watson (Belle). Their natural chemistry and connection really effectively display the growing attraction and the CHOICE Belle is making to stay and help. Their work together was incredible. Putting in twice the performances to fully form this amazing character paid off. You can tell that this is a real man acting within the beastly confines. Stevens creates a wonderful character (on par with many of the master Andy Sirkus). The Beast has depth and feeling and the effect is ohly enhances by Ms. Watson's nuanced performance. She gives a smart, relateable, and sensitive performance as Belle. THIS is the girl I want my daughter to emulate. The household objects were all lovingly voiced by some of the best actors in Hollywood. Ewan McGregor (Lumiere), Ian McKellan (Cogsworth), Emma Thompson (Mrs. Potts), Stanley Tucci (Cadenza), Gugu Mbatha-Raw (Plumette), Audra McDonald (Mdm. Garderobe) and newcomer Nathan Mack. At moments the objects felt a little stagnant and I think that it was just lost in translation a little, but the vocal work was exceptional. This is a movie for fans and it does not disappoint. Come and enjoy this wonderful feast!… Expand

3 of 9 users found this helpful36

All this user's reviews

10

ooberscooterMar 24, 2017

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Apologetically lavish and over the top. This is a movie that is meant to enchant and entertain. The meticulously designed rococo castle is stunning, and the cast of furniture is truly magical while remaining realistic. This movie doesn't try to be something it's not, it's highs are very high and it does achieve some real emotional depth (the windmill, and the frantic sadness of the furniture at the end when they temporarily die). I've been so sick of the dark remakes and this stays true to the tone of the original while delivering true doses of honest joy. Alan Menken is amazing of course and all the music is exquisitely arranged and produced. The only downside for me was the heavy autotone which from time-to-time took me out the enchanted and magical world this movie so easily puts me in.… Expand

4 of 11 users found this helpful47

All this user's reviews

10

EvanjesseMar 23, 2017

I really enjoyed it was great fun it doesn't live up the 1991 version it still best Disney live action really enjoyed Luke Evans performance as Gaston and Josh Gad did great job

5 of 11 users found this helpful56

All this user's reviews

10

hectorjmtMar 23, 2017

This has to be one of the most beautiful movies I've seen so far. The edition, the whole project is just beautiful. Emma Watson did an incredible job as Belle, as a matter of fact, everyone embodied their characters perfectly. 10/10

2 of 9 users found this helpful27

All this user's reviews

7

MasterRileyMar 23, 2017

Beauty and the Beast is a very enjoyable adaptation with a great cast, great music pieces and singing, beautiful costumes and locations, and a large sense of heart you'd come to expect from the fairy tale. At times it can be a little sillyBeauty and the Beast is a very enjoyable adaptation with a great cast, great music pieces and singing, beautiful costumes and locations, and a large sense of heart you'd come to expect from the fairy tale. At times it can be a little silly and others predictable, but really its what we've come to expect from the well known story.… Expand

0 of 6 users found this helpful06

All this user's reviews

2

ChuckAmuckMar 23, 2017

The closer to the release date, the more worried I got about this film. Most of what I was hearing about it in interviews and news was gimmicky tricks and passes at incorporating modern changes sounded false and not genuine. While watchingThe closer to the release date, the more worried I got about this film. Most of what I was hearing about it in interviews and news was gimmicky tricks and passes at incorporating modern changes sounded false and not genuine. While watching the film I discovered I was correct, a lot of what I was promised was not delivered. Unlike the usual standard of vocal performance in a disney movie, this film had some lower points I wasn't expecting. My opinions of the cast are very mixed, I was quite surprised by ewan mcgreggor but let down by luke evans. The beast doesn't translate perfectly into live action, but dan stevens work really helped make this a more believable creature. I didn't believe emma watson was anything but an acting performance, there was very little truth in her and i thought this was the flattest part of the film. I was quite intrigued by some of the new scenes not featured in the disney original but by the end of the film they felt contrived and unnecessary. Back story and expansions could have been done much better.… Expand

7 of 16 users found this helpful79

All this user's reviews

3

JadoraMar 23, 2017

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I was somewhat excited to see this movie only to be disappointed as soon as i heard Emma Watson was cast as belle. I don't think in all honesty she can act whatsoever, i feel like her performance as Belle was just basically Emma renamed for the production, as in Harry Potter she was very suited to the role however i felt that character also was not acting it was simply herself but a snotty know it all. Emma certainly brought no joy or passion to the movie, emotions none existent, song very flat the best part was Gaston and Le Fou but even Luke Evans wasn't that great, he was somewhat okay but there was not enough ego for Gaston. Scenes, Added and none existent; a slave to all original Disney movies the fact that songs, scenes were added whilst other scenes from the original were missed leaves it very poor. Gaston doesn't ask Le fou to strike up the band for her proposal, it simply doesn't happen. The opening scene was unnecessary Lumiere looked like a cheap Monopoly piece, not like the cute one from the cartoon that looks like hers wearing a turtle neck, the furniture ect... weren't as cute looking like the original i might expect too much but the CGI for the beast was exactly that, too much! Added songs killed my soul i got bored quickly the back story for belle wasn't that needed. I felt like an original story was changed as if it was from a different perspective like Malificient but that film was great! That was the same story with a slight twist not something changed and over sold. I am really gutted this film turned out the way it has. Lets hope they don't flatten anything else we have like they did with Bad and the boring.… Expand

7 of 16 users found this helpful79

All this user's reviews

8

SileSixEchoMar 23, 2017

Very well made with great music and fitting actors. I didn't like some minor choices in the end of the movies and the end is a bit to cheesy but that doesn't stop the movie for being great and remaining a classic for new generations.

3 of 7 users found this helpful34

All this user's reviews

10

ShnellMar 22, 2017

I loved it!! Ever since I saw the first commercial, I couldn't wait to see it. I knew I would like it regardless but it was better than I thought it was going to be! I want to go see it in the theater again. Good stuff - go see it!

11 of 18 users found this helpful117

All this user's reviews

9

CrunchyGranolaMar 22, 2017

The original Beauty and the Beast animated movie is one of my all time favorites, so I had some trepidation about the live-action remake. But, as my rating shows, I was pleased and impressed by the new effort.

Emma Watson is the only actressThe original Beauty and the Beast animated movie is one of my all time favorites, so I had some trepidation about the live-action remake. But, as my rating shows, I was pleased and impressed by the new effort.

Emma Watson is the only actress that I could have accepted as the bookish, plucky Belle since it is who Watson really is, and who she played so many years as Hermione, and she did a creditable job. All of the other roles are also well cast The movie adds additional elements to the story, and its telling, that overall work very well. The timeline is clarified; the relationship of the town to the castle, the haunted forest, and the magic spell are also knitted together better. LeFou has become his own character, with his own comic moments, and real friendship with Gaston, who depends on LeFou to stabilize him at times. This is the single largest addition to the story and is entirely successful. The movie is also updated a bit for present day sensibilities in showing that a fair part of Gaston's male posse have man-crushes (LeFou), or latent feelings of which they are unaware (two of this other followers), all of which I liked.

There is a new song for the beast when he lets Belle go, which I thought was very good, and really needed by the story. I will miss it in the future when viewing the original animated movie (the Ebert site disses the new song, I think the reviewer is all washed up).

Another minor difference: the "bookshop" in the town has comically few books - which actually makes sense for the town as it is, and enhances the contrast of Belle's encounter with the Beast's vast library.

The "battle" scene in the castle involving the townspeople, where they are routed by the enchanted inhabitants played well - it makes perfect sense that the ordinary folk with get spooked by their magicked opponents and cut and run, leaving only the aggressive conceited Gaston to carry on the attack.

Any criticisms? Some.

Watson does get a little lost in castle scenes, they let them overwhelm the actress's presence. The run-time is a little long, and could have been tightened up a bit. The animation of Mrs. Potts was a little creepy. And I really missed the lovely, magical, narrated stained-glass introduction of the original.

Was a live-action remake of Beauty and the Beast necessary? Of course not. Is it better than the original? Again, no (that would be impossible). But I am glad that they did a creditable job.… Expand

2 of 9 users found this helpful27

All this user's reviews

6

SpangleMar 21, 2017

Having never seen the original animated film, or at least not remembering having seen it, my expectations were not too high for Beauty and the Beast. Do not get me wrong, I never thought it would be bad. But, I was never comparing it to someHaving never seen the original animated film, or at least not remembering having seen it, my expectations were not too high for Beauty and the Beast. Do not get me wrong, I never thought it would be bad. But, I was never comparing it to some childhood classic that filled me with nostalgia every time I thought of watching the film. Instead, I saw this film in a vacuum. Unfortunately, it is still a mixed bag. At times, you can feel that fairy tale magic that is promised. Other moments provide sensory overload or are complete filler and wholly unnecessary. The end result is a potion that both enchants and befuddles in near equal measure.

From its very first frame, Beauty and the Beast shows its tedious footing between grating and magical. Its opening sequence of the Beast/Prince Charming (Dan Stevens) getting cursed by an enchantress has both incredible special effects and preposterous make-up. It is well applied, but it seems too exuberant and practically flamboyant with how much make-up the Prince is wearing to his party. That said, the scene still imbues the sense of mystery and magic necessary for the film and its immediate follow-up, the performance of the song "Belle", really hits the mark. Emma Watson's singing is lovely as Belle as she goes through her small French village and the various villagers express their reservations about Belle and her quirky bookworm behavior. It is a real charmer and is a song that gets the proceedings off to a terrific musical beginning, quickly displaying why this film's music is beloved by so many.

Unfortunately, the film then takes some poor turns. In its performance of "Gaston", a loud and incredibly well-choreographed musical number mostly performed by LeFou (Josh Gad), Gaston's (Luke Evans) closest companion, the film hits a real sour note. The song is simply too much. Compared to the more restrained staging of "Belle", "Gaston" is over-the-top and further maligned by an awful joke about the spelling of his name and LeFou's illiteracy. At this point, I was wondering if it was a mistake and the film would not be nearly as good as hoped. These fears were realized when we reach the Prince's castle. While the banter between Lumiere (Ewan McGregor) and Cogsworth (Ian McKellen) was immediately appealing, the arrival at the castle is marked by a few bad moments. One, when Belle is shown her room and the camera does a whip pan. Early in the film, during the performance of "Belle", I noticed some quick camera movements that immediately bothered my eyes. However, I had ignored them because I figured that I was simply a bit tired. Sadly, this eye shattering whip only served to make my strained eyes scream out in anguish. My eyes were not treated kindly in the follow-up to this either with the performance of "Be Our Guest". While the song is fine, the glowing sensory overload that ensues on the dinner table is just far too much. It had bright lights and excitement to try and attract kids to the joy on screen, but it felt far too hollow and bombastic to actually work in any effective way.

Fortunately, the film picks up considerably at this point as it begins to focus on the romance between the Beast and Belle. This is a romance that would charm warmth in the coldest and blackest of hearts. Via songs such as "Something There", "Beauty and the Beast", and "Evermore", the film strikes a heart warmingly romantic tone that rewards viewers with the magic of a fairy tale, terrific songs, and an awe-inducing romance. Together, Watson and Stevens have terrific chemistry in these forms and work incredibly well with one another. Small moments of them simply walking into a library or over a bridge are moving, poetic, and achingly romantic. The film has so much heart, it nearly swells and boils over. Now, these sequences do have their flaws. Though the visual effects of the film are impeccable, especially with Belle's dress - a real highlight of these live-action remakes have been the dresses, as the realization of Cinderella's ball gown with the accompanying visual effects is still stunning to me - and the beast is also incredibly well-realized. That said, there are still issues with the effects. On the bridge, while romantic, it is clear it is occurring in front of a green screen. There are other moments scattered throughout that are unfortunately stricken by shaky visual effects. Fortunately, the whole romance of them falling in love is so well-written and realized, it is hard to deny the film's magic. Accented by charming turns by Ewan McGregor, Ian McKellen, and Emma Thompson as some of the Beast's cursed helpers, the film strikes a good balance between the more romantic elements and the comedic elements.… Expand

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

0

EVERYB0DYMar 21, 2017

Autotune.Autotune. … Expand

16 of 34 users found this helpful1618

All this user's reviews

8

foxgroveMar 21, 2017

Whilst not as delightful as the original animated version, this at least benefits by having a director of some note and talent guiding it. The result is more than the predictable journeyman telling that so hindered 'Cinderella' a couple ofWhilst not as delightful as the original animated version, this at least benefits by having a director of some note and talent guiding it. The result is more than the predictable journeyman telling that so hindered 'Cinderella' a couple of years ago. Bill Condon moves the tale along at some pace despite a rather long running time. The musical numbers are extremely well staged especially 'Be my Guest' and 'Gaston' and camera work is imaginative. Luke Evans is a revelation here as 'Gaston' and his charismatic turn more than compensates for the shortcomings of Emma Watson's Rather listless Belle. She fails to impress either musically or dramatically. However, the film is so surprisingly entertaining and breathtakingly beautiful to look at that even her limitations can't derail the overall impact. The score is lovely, although the new songs are not up to the standard of the original ones, and production values -Design, costumes, visual effects, make-up and sound are all on the money. The ending is a bit too cutesy, but the (controversial? get over it!) gay sidekick adds some welcome humour and is an inspired touch.… Expand

2 of 9 users found this helpful27

All this user's reviews

0

ProsmoothMar 21, 2017

Absolutely the worst gay themed film I've ever seen. For one thing, the entire plot is a love story about a prince and a female commoner. Our entire Broadway musical fanclub went to see it, hoping it was the next Brokeback Mountain, but leftAbsolutely the worst gay themed film I've ever seen. For one thing, the entire plot is a love story about a prince and a female commoner. Our entire Broadway musical fanclub went to see it, hoping it was the next Brokeback Mountain, but left really disappointed and confused. Songs are fabulous and fierce though. Still--avoid.… Expand

17 of 38 users found this helpful1721

All this user's reviews

0

BarnyMar 21, 2017

Well, if Autotune is what you enjoy then you will be in for the treat of a decade. The cast is mismatched: Lefou should have been played by Jack Black, Belle should have been played by another actress (Watson is a one-trick pony and it showWell, if Autotune is what you enjoy then you will be in for the treat of a decade. The cast is mismatched: Lefou should have been played by Jack Black, Belle should have been played by another actress (Watson is a one-trick pony and it show so prominently) , Gaston is too much of a weakling. There is also far more animation in this "live action" than in the original cartoon but in the same time, both the cast and director managed to loose the lifelikeness of the original production (that is a pretty neat trick in itself). I give it a big fat 0 at it deserve little more than that, it is a mere lifeless derivative rehash. If only they had used ideas from the movie with Jean Marais, I may even had understood. But not even close: this one product is made to entertain consumers.… Expand

20 of 44 users found this helpful2024

All this user's reviews

9

GreatGatsbyMar 20, 2017

Beauty and the Beast achieved in creating a film that captured the animated beauty that dazzled us all, while achieving in adding elements to the story that help in creating a more cohesive film.Beauty and the Beast adds it's own elementsBeauty and the Beast achieved in creating a film that captured the animated beauty that dazzled us all, while achieving in adding elements to the story that help in creating a more cohesive film.Beauty and the Beast adds it's own elements that offer explanations to both Belle and the Beast's individual tales, offering the viewer more simpathy for our main duo. The film is at its best when it creates the amazing musical numbers of the original, both visually and musically, especially the new music additions, especially the tune Evermore that brilliantly provides Dan Steven's Beast his own sorrowful tune. The film is only hindered by the dragging out certain musical numbers and elements, mostly just to provide the film an acceptable run time. And of course the original will always hold a charm that will always put it a notch above its live action counterpart. As its own interpretation, however, each character is casted perfectly, especially Josh Gad as LeFou, while bringing the beauty of the original to life in amazing special effects, and dazzling musical numbers. Beauty and the Beast should easily take place as one of the best family films of the year.… Expand

5 of 13 users found this helpful58

All this user's reviews

10

DestacMar 20, 2017

I was let´s see the beauty and the beast with the family, and has been incredible. Was added parts new what gave more sense at movie, adding things of the past of the protagonists. They added new musicals parts without spoiling essence, makesI was let´s see the beauty and the beast with the family, and has been incredible. Was added parts new what gave more sense at movie, adding things of the past of the protagonists. They added new musicals parts without spoiling essence, makes you remember to past.

No doubt will you remember to movie the 1991 it will make you feel nostalgic.

As ultimate data, the people applauded at movie finish. Thanks Disney and keep doing movies so, respecting the classic.… Expand

5 of 14 users found this helpful59

All this user's reviews

0

TropicalReviewsMar 20, 2017

I personally did not really enjoy this movie. First of all I felt it was slow and boring. Emma Watsons voice sounded really autotuned but she did do a good job portraying Belle. This movie does not beat the Original Classic. Overall thisI personally did not really enjoy this movie. First of all I felt it was slow and boring. Emma Watsons voice sounded really autotuned but she did do a good job portraying Belle. This movie does not beat the Original Classic. Overall this movie didn't come together for me.… Expand

14 of 29 users found this helpful1415

All this user's reviews

8

GreatMartinMar 20, 2017

This Walt Disney combination of live and animated action has to be one of the most overproduced productions ever but no matter how thousands of napkins, dishes and gowns swirl around on the screen the basic story that makes "Beauty and theThis Walt Disney combination of live and animated action has to be one of the most overproduced productions ever but no matter how thousands of napkins, dishes and gowns swirl around on the screen the basic story that makes "Beauty and the Beast" a classic is still there.

Whether speaking through an animated object or being seen on screen, even if very briefly, it is always a joy to hear/see Ian McKellen, Stanley Tucci, Ewan McGregor, Audra McDonald, Emma Thompson and the glorious Gugu MBatha-Raw along with Nathan Mack as Chip the teacup. (Be sure to stay for ending credits.)

Emma Watson fills the shoes of Belle being the equal of any Disney's princesses and has the voice to match the image while Dan Stevens as the Beast is hidden behind fur and horns most of the movie and has a number near the end that he belts out with assurance. In addition it has Kevin Kline, always welcome in any movie, as Belle's father given more background than previous versions but not a major song to sing. Luke Evans is as narcissistic as any Gaston can be while Josh Gad, as his sidekick, is a delight in the movie.

The original songs by Alan Menken and Howard Ashman from the 1991 animated film are in the new plus 4 new songs by Menken and Tim Rice. The screenplay by Stephen Chbosky and Evan Spilotopoulos has added a lot of background giving the new film a running time of 2 hours and 9 minutes while the original animated 1991 film was 1 hour and 24 minutes. Let's talk about the 'scandal, associated with this film which would take more time to explain then what doesn't take place on the screen. Blink your eyes and you will miss it plus the exact same thing and more has been seen at least 20 times before and how many times have you seen men kiss, by accident in movies, which doesn't happen here! “Much ado about nothing.”

I have seen the animated film twice and the Broadway stage show three times, still as elaborate as this production is I will always fall for the love story and the 'tale as old as time'.… Expand

2 of 15 users found this helpful213

All this user's reviews

7

CineAutoctonoMar 20, 2017

"Beauty and the Beast" was a very good movie, where the essence of the animated film was very valuable, the characters I really liked, especially the characters of Bella, the Beast and Gaston. Emma Watson, Dan Stevens and Luke Evans stood out"Beauty and the Beast" was a very good movie, where the essence of the animated film was very valuable, the characters I really liked, especially the characters of Bella, the Beast and Gaston. Emma Watson, Dan Stevens and Luke Evans stood out in their characters, the story was very nice and very funny, one of the best of the year.… Expand

1 of 10 users found this helpful19

All this user's reviews

0

StellenMar 20, 2017

Really brought nothing to the film, just a naked cash-grab in a scene-for-scene remake of the animated film. A year from now, nobody will remember this movie at all.

15 of 33 users found this helpful1518

All this user's reviews

8

VirgonoShakaMar 19, 2017

To be perfectly honest, I haven't been super enthusiastic about the live action adaptations of Disney's animated classic, mostly by concept than by execution, haven't watched neither the cinderella one nor the Jungle Book (although I haveTo be perfectly honest, I haven't been super enthusiastic about the live action adaptations of Disney's animated classic, mostly by concept than by execution, haven't watched neither the cinderella one nor the Jungle Book (although I have heard that one is very good and plannig to do so soon), but considering that this one is based on probably the best animated Dinsey movie ever (I consider Fantasia to be slightly better) it has huge shoes to try and emulate. And all things considered, I think it works for the most part as a "remaster" of the animated one. It maintains the core concept, songs and shots, and although that may cause some to just want to see the animated one, to me it captured at least most of the magic while adding some cool bits in general, especiallt trying to close some details that didn't made sense in the animated one (althought ironically adding a couple more) and adding some interestin background to the main an supporting cast. All in all, a great example of a movie done with care and true love for the original animated one. It was never supposed to be better, but for what it is, excellent production design, great music, great voice talent, good acting, and some great shots here and there, it leaves me with a great sense of nostalgia but also enjoyment. Recommended in general and if you like Disney, what are you doing reading this, go and watch it.… Expand

2 of 9 users found this helpful27

All this user's reviews

8

GuyBeasleyMar 19, 2017

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. A few weeks ago my twin brother and i sat down to watch the original Beauty and the Beast, because what better did we have to do. As soon as the movie started i got hooked, the songs, the characters, are just magnificent throughout the entire film. And this is how i felt with the live action version of the film. I got hooked right from the beginning of the film. Emma Watson as belle i feel did an amazing job. Belle is a character that you can relate to and i think Emma Watson did a great job portraying that aspect. A lot of people are saying that this film is too much like the original. I totally agree that it follows the same story line and main ideas, but as Chris stuckmannn would say, " if it isn't broke dont fix it". so overall I loved watching this film and would definitely recommend it!… Expand

1 of 11 users found this helpful110

All this user's reviews

7

coltonjamesMar 19, 2017

After Disney’s live-action remakes of Cinderella and The Jungle Book, Beauty and the Beast has a lot to live up to. It must take their (arguably) most popular animated film and transition it for modern audiences. With a cast consisting ofAfter Disney’s live-action remakes of Cinderella and The Jungle Book, Beauty and the Beast has a lot to live up to. It must take their (arguably) most popular animated film and transition it for modern audiences. With a cast consisting of mostly inanimate objects and a minotaur-like brute, director Bill Condon had a difficult task ahead of him. Thankfully, he was more than up for the challenge. Beauty and the Beast, for the most part, is a success despite some major flaws in its leads. A selfish prince, Dan Stevens, is doomed to live as a hideous beast, unless he finds true love. In walks Belle, Emma Watson, as the prince’s cursed staff makes a last-ditch effort for the prince to free them of their enchantment and find true happiness. I never believed in the relationship between Belle and the Beast. They didn’t have any chemistry until the final act of the film and it felt rushed. Watson and Stevens were serviceable in the leading roles, but unlike the rest of the cast, they felt replaceable. For most of movie, neither are given much to do. Watson seemed present in her scenes and that’s about it. She never felt charming or had any depth to her. Stevens was never intimidating as the Beast, and I didn’t have as much sympathy for him as I should have. Fortunately, the rest of the ensemble cast more than makes up for the lacking leads. Luke Evans and Josh Gad are perfectly cast. Evans shines as the incredibly narcissistic yet immensely likeable Gaston, while Gad’s take on the quirky and bumbling LeFou has the funniest moments of the film. The performance of “Gaston” was easily the best part of the movie. The nefarious duo steal each scene they’re in and I left the movie wishing they had more screen time. A lineup of all-time greats, including Ian McKellen, Emma Thompson and Stanley Tucci, make up the enchanted staff. Each actor and actress gives a larger than life performance and they all work great, with Ewan McGregor being the standout with his excellent rendition of “Be Our Guest”. The musical numbers drew me in and never felt out of place. Iconic songs such as “Beauty and the Beast” were done with admiration and were satisfying to see onscreen. Director Condon utilizes epic set designs and sweeping shots of beautiful landscapes to make Beauty and the Beast feel like a fairy tale come to real life. The tone is light-hearted, but dark when it needs to be. I would be laughing at a joke from LeFou in one scene, and feel deep sorrow for the cursed inhabitants of the castle in the next. It is a delicate balance that gives the film its emotional depth. The visual effects of the film are, for the most part, decent if not passable. However, the Beast looks near realistic in some scenes, but cartoonish in many others. It can be distracting when it appears Emma Watson is acting against something that isn’t as real as her. Despite some key character flaws and minor inconsistencies, I found Beauty and the Beast to be Disney’s best live-action remake yet. I was invested in the enchanted staff’s desperate attempt to make Belle fall for the Beast, and I had great time watching Gaston’s smug endeavors to woo Belle. The fun-spirited tone and energetic performances of the supporting cast left me feeling cheerful as I exited the theater. Disney keeps setting the bar higher and higher with its remakes, and they keep delivering.… Expand

1 of 8 users found this helpful17

All this user's reviews

10

TomamaMar 19, 2017

Amazing! By far and away a Beauty of all remakes! Music was fantastic! The shortest 2 hour movie ever! I would see it again and again! Can't speak more highly of this movie!

4 of 15 users found this helpful411

All this user's reviews

8

avr50Mar 19, 2017

This Beauty and the beast is never going to be as good as the original,but it has some elements that makes it more relatable and true to the story.
All the musical numbers are beatiful, "Be our guest" is a little over the top but visuallyThis Beauty and the beast is never going to be as good as the original,but it has some elements that makes it more relatable and true to the story.
All the musical numbers are beatiful, "Be our guest" is a little over the top but visually stunning.
There are some things that were not necesary to add and others that are most welcome (Evermore)
This is an enjoyable film that you can watch with the hall family and friends. Do not worry about the scandal about lefou; it was necessary to add this to the character because is a movie that celebrates been diferent.… Expand

3 of 11 users found this helpful38

All this user's reviews

8

thenerdport77Mar 18, 2017

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. overall this was a solid movie. This movie was honestly better than the original. What it was able to do was flesh out the story for the father the beast and bell when then talk about how the mother died, and how the beast became the beast. Overall good see this movie.… Expand

11 of 17 users found this helpful116

All this user's reviews

6

MrMovieBuffMar 18, 2017

When I heard that Disney would be remaking 'Beauty and the Beast' (1991), my favorite ever Disney animated film, into live-action, especially with this cast of actors... it's hard not to get excited. 'Beauty and the Beast' (1991) is without aWhen I heard that Disney would be remaking 'Beauty and the Beast' (1991), my favorite ever Disney animated film, into live-action, especially with this cast of actors... it's hard not to get excited. 'Beauty and the Beast' (1991) is without a doubt, as close to a perfect Disney animated film as you could get... so perfect that it became the first animated feature to be nominated for the "Best Picture" Academy Award. Not to mention that with 'Cinderella' (2015) and 'The Jungle Book' (2016) turning out to be surprisingly good, there were more reasons to get excited. Now I'm not sure if it was my expectations that did this to me, but I found Disney's live-action, and arguably more modern, take on this "Tale as old as time" to be mostly okay! I'm not going to waste my time summarizing the plot as I'm sure everybody should have seen the original film by now, so I'm just going to explain what I liked and what didn't work out so well for me. What I liked was the choice of actors and their roles; Emma Watson, best known for playing the bookworm and intelligent Hermione Granger in the "Harry Potter" franchise, fits the role of Belle since these two characters are not that different, so it seems. Her singing, admittedly, does sound auto-tuned - especially when she hits the high notes - but it's not bad. She did her best, and that's admirable. Dan Stevens ('Downton Abbey') plays the Beast very well too, with enough anger and arrogance to make him almost no different to his animated counterpart. Luke Evans and Josh Gad share terrific chemistry as Gaston and LeFou, and Gad's version of the "Gaston" song sounds eerily similar to the original version from 1991... clearly Gad thrives in playing Disney sidekicks (many of you may remember him as Olaf the snowman in 'Frozen'). Ewan McGregor ('Trainspotting' and 'Star Wars') surprised me as Lumiere, a role I didn't think he would play well, but, his version of "Be Our Guest" is something I wouldn't mind listening to again. He shares funny chemistry with Ian McKellen as Cogsworth, not to mention Emma Thompson is fantastic as Mrs. Potts, and her version of the enchanting "Beauty and the Beast" number is also something worth downloading. The production design of this film cannot be faulted as well, much like 'Cinderella' (2015) two years ago, it's very lavish and great to look at. Now for the not-so-good things. The movie spends a lot of time trying to be too much like its animated counterpart, shot-by-shot some scenes look similar, the dialogue is also very much the same, yet the execution of these lines don't sound as natural as they should have. If just the musical numbers, the lyrics, remained similar to the original, that's fine... but 80% of the dialogue in this movie, maybe more, was just from the original. And they don't have the same beat...

The lead characters, played by Emma Watson and Dan Stevens, two gifted young actors, unfortunately for me, lacked a bit of chemistry. I didn't feel as if there were any spark or emotional intensity like their animated versions. This isn't a problem with their acting, I think it has to do with the script and the editing execution. What I did like was the near ending, the way they executed the last petal falling from the rose, and how the characters react to that I thought was emotionally heavy. I'll give director Bill Condon credit for trying to be as respectful to the original movie as possible, but focus on the like-able characters, don't worry too much about making look aesthetically similar to the original by using the same camera-work. The reasons why 'Cinderella' (2015) and 'The Jungle Book' (2016) worked so well was because they didn't concentrate too much on being similar to the original, they still made it about character, and why these stories were so important. Those remakes were able to stand on their own without the need to watch their original versions. 'Beauty and the Beast' however, it seems wants to be compared to the original, so much so that it tries to be similar in both camera-work and dialogue. But the characters come second nature... This isn't an insulting remake like Tim Burton's 'Alice in Wonderland' (2010) or a dull and excruciatingly ludicrous one like 'Maleficent' (2014) (a movie I found difficult to sit through), this is something fans should see. See it for the music, the production design, and just the overall nostalgia. But don't expect a "Best Picture"-level movie... leave that to the original 1991 animated classic.… Expand

3 of 9 users found this helpful36

All this user's reviews

7

marcmyworksMar 18, 2017

The strength in Beauty and the Beast is the nostalgia it brings to people of a certain age. I loved the addition of the tracks featured from the musical, however at times it becomes too ornate. The castle may be filled with objects that comeThe strength in Beauty and the Beast is the nostalgia it brings to people of a certain age. I loved the addition of the tracks featured from the musical, however at times it becomes too ornate. The castle may be filled with objects that come to life, however at times the abundance of CG causes them to too fake and flat to be as interesting as their original animated counterparts.… Expand

8 of 15 users found this helpful87

All this user's reviews

10

Matthewb13Mar 18, 2017

This is a stunning movie with sets that are spectacular. The cg used here flows so well with the movie that you almost forget that its there. Emma Watson as belle is marvelous and does so well to flesh out the character. People may be upsetThis is a stunning movie with sets that are spectacular. The cg used here flows so well with the movie that you almost forget that its there. Emma Watson as belle is marvelous and does so well to flesh out the character. People may be upset that its so similar to the original (which it is) but they did it in such a way that they make us love the story even more, and the stuff they did change only gives the movie more depth and emotion. Overall i loved Beauty and the Beast and i give it an A.… Expand

11 of 21 users found this helpful1110

All this user's reviews

9

LinttaFlamingoMar 18, 2017

There's pretty much nothing different from the animated one, but as a movie that tries to be a live action remake of Beauty and the Beast, it really is. I had a blast watching this movie! Such a good looking remake that nailed the songs andThere's pretty much nothing different from the animated one, but as a movie that tries to be a live action remake of Beauty and the Beast, it really is. I had a blast watching this movie! Such a good looking remake that nailed the songs and the story was clearly there and the characters worked just as well as in the original. And all these amazing actors like Emma Watson, Luke Evans, Dan Stevens and Josh Gad did a wonderful job! Easily recommended.… Expand

17 of 27 users found this helpful1710

All this user's reviews

7

Muskrat147Mar 18, 2017

It may seem as a simple cash grab for fans of the original, but Beauty and the Beast capitalizes on its talented performers and fantastic visuals to deliver a remake that is both fresh and nostalgic.

11 of 23 users found this helpful1112

All this user's reviews

0

HonestEngine7Mar 18, 2017

Boring re-hash of what was an excellent animated film. Also very disappointed in the addition of propaganda that was not in the original film. Many young children will watch this, and they are very impressionable. Shame on you Disney :(

24 of 59 users found this helpful2435

All this user's reviews

9

JRRRMar 18, 2017

In my opinion this doesn't top the original, that's a masterpiece and timeless, but I can easily see this version become a classic as well, fantastic casting, fantastic voices, loved Beast, Gaston, even Lefou. If you love the original giveIn my opinion this doesn't top the original, that's a masterpiece and timeless, but I can easily see this version become a classic as well, fantastic casting, fantastic voices, loved Beast, Gaston, even Lefou. If you love the original give this a try, it might surprise you.… Expand

15 of 26 users found this helpful1511

All this user's reviews

10

FriendlessMar 17, 2017

Beauty and the Beast may not be everyone's cup of tea (HA!) but what else could you POSSIBLY ask of the genre? This movie featured a solid cast that delivered a performance which felt so genuine. The plot was exciting and built up a lot ofBeauty and the Beast may not be everyone's cup of tea (HA!) but what else could you POSSIBLY ask of the genre? This movie featured a solid cast that delivered a performance which felt so genuine. The plot was exciting and built up a lot of tension. The soundtrack was well produced and timed. The visuals were on par with anything else nowadays. On top of all of this, it had the nostalgic characters and props from the the original. If you think the 1991 version was something to rave about, this one should be right there in the discussion. This movie was a MASTERPIECE.… Expand

11 of 23 users found this helpful1112

All this user's reviews

9

Davrosdaleks1Mar 17, 2017

Really liked this film! It's rare that you see people in the theater clap.

A lot of people complain that this is a rehash, and yes, they're right. But, it's a really good rehash. The director and screenwriters were wise enough to stick withReally liked this film! It's rare that you see people in the theater clap.

A lot of people complain that this is a rehash, and yes, they're right. But, it's a really good rehash. The director and screenwriters were wise enough to stick with the key points of the original film while adding some new stuff that really worked. More background and humanization are given to characters causing the film to come across as a little darker and more mature than the original. The actual romance between Beast and Belle feels so much stronger. It also fixes plot holes and pacing issues from the original. One weak spot is that this film has so many characters that the director has some trouble juggling the more supporting characters.

The film is beautiful. Has a brightly colored, ornate French fairy tale look. The redesigns to the enchanted object characters are really unique. The computer animation is impressive. Cinematography is good, but I do feel that some of the camera angles could have been improved upon. Contains all the original designs. A couple of songs have some slight lyric changes, but I feel that they suited the new context of the film. They did drop the Gaston reprise, due to plot changes. I'm disappointed but understand their reasons. There are 4 new songs in this, which I liked. The song Evermore is especially good. One downside of the new films is that 3 out of four of them are ballads and I kind of wish there were more dynamic differences between songs.

Cast is great. Special credit should be given to Josh Gad, a living imp, and Dan Stevens, who brings so much emotion and nuance to the role.

Rehash or no I recommend it to everyone.… Expand

13 of 26 users found this helpful1313

All this user's reviews

0

MahbubAli92Mar 17, 2017

Really disappointing rehash from Disney. Why again did anyone think this movie needed to be made? The original was superb, this one is a soulless mess. It throws in some very minor plot tweaks and additions from the original, but otherwiseReally disappointing rehash from Disney. Why again did anyone think this movie needed to be made? The original was superb, this one is a soulless mess. It throws in some very minor plot tweaks and additions from the original, but otherwise it's hard to deny this is just a cash grab nostalgia play, like an increasingly large percentage of Hollywood's output seems to be. The singing is unimpressive (frankly these actors don't have the voices for it compared to the original renditions) and Belle never really sells you on having fallen for the Beast, she seems like she's only going through the motions. The best I can say about it is that it really helps you fully appreciate just how well done the original was by contrast. Watch that again instead of overpaying for this flash-but-hollow dreck.

PS: Homosexual intimacy doesn't belong in family-friendly films, period. Shame on Disney for trying to hamhandedly crowbar controversial alternative-lifestyle elements like that into a lighthearted movie for children. That's not what anyone goes to a movie like this to see.… Expand

30 of 72 users found this helpful3042

All this user's reviews

10

cforthewinMar 17, 2017

the movie is a timely well made, and well acted update of the 1991 animated classic. While it may not reach the same height of the original, it is still a worthy companion.

12 of 39 users found this helpful1227

All this user's reviews

4

TrevorsViewMar 17, 2017

It’s been a tale as old as time, a song as old as rhyme… Beauty and the Beast. It was one of the animated instant classics to trigger the Disney Renaissance of the 1990s, defined an entire generation of Disney fans, set off some of the mostIt’s been a tale as old as time, a song as old as rhyme… Beauty and the Beast. It was one of the animated instant classics to trigger the Disney Renaissance of the 1990s, defined an entire generation of Disney fans, set off some of the most iconic songs ever to grace the screen, was honored in several lists by the American Film Institute, was preserved in the National Film Registry the second year it was eligible (which is a huge deal), and was the first animated film in history to receive an Academy Award nomination for Best Picture.

So no pressure or anything in remaking it, right?

Many of us were worried that this remake would just be a line-for-line remake of the original, but thankfully it’s not. Several updates to the story are actually a strong improvement to fill in the problems with the original. The whole village’s memory of the castle is erased by the enchantress, a contrast made much more blaring by a cursed eternal winter in the castle’s borders even while summer goes on in the village.

Belle’s father Maurice also has a more complex subplot that actively engages both Gaston and LeFou, and he is motivated by his collection of homemade paintings and inventions used to memorialize his family legacy. This includes a backstory on Belle’s mother, even if it adds virtually nothing to the plot.

Other minor details are added to motivate Belle further, such as teaching a younger village girl to read, only to be condemned by others in the village. The parents will also enjoy this little detail: Gaston is a former war hero, which gives his musical number a whole new flavor. They also would find this new take on the Beast somewhat compelling: he doesn’t even try to treat Belle decently as she first comes into the castle. He just keeps her in the prison, only to be moved into an appropriate bedroom without his consent or knowledge.

There are plenty of other small plot holes from the original that are explained here, as the characters make it blatantly clear. What I mean is, it is done like this: one character asks a question we all asked about the original, then another character simply answers the question. Then the plot moves on as if nothing happened. So no high-class writing to be found here.

Although when taking the whole sum of the product into consideration, the elements that remain the same compared to the original fall way, way short. The director of this live action adaptation, Bill Condon, who directed Dreamgirls and wrote the screenplay for Chicago, would presumably know all about how to do a musical properly. Although his skill is screaming to get out this time around, as nothing commands our sorrow for his reimagining of the beloved characters. With the exception of “Be Our Guest,” none of the musical numbers or recreated scenes match the energy or creativity of its animated counterpart. I’m not just referring to the fact that most to everyone’s singing voices are hard on the ears, but mainly to the fact that everything is rushed, especially the scene in the West Wing.

If you think that you would feel charmed and nostalgic while watching this, sorry—not happening. Maybe it works as a plot expansion of a previously established story, but as a standalone you couldn’t help but see the flaws. Belle even looks at the Beast more like she’s scowling than like she’s captivated by him. Then with Gaston, he doesn’t feel like a jerk at all, as in his first meeting with Belle, he doesn’t chuck her book into the mud- but actually hands her flowers! Flowers! From the guy we’re supposed to hate! It’s little details like this that will halt any true joy or tears. But what else would you expect when a remake is produced by a studio that cares more about social correctness than casting actual French actors for a film set in France?

Speaking of which, you may all be wondering at this point, “what about the exclusively gay moment with LeFou? Should I worry about it harming my kids?” Well, I can tell you this: You have absolutely nothing to worry about. It’s a two second moment at the very end that is just as subtle as it is super easy to toss onto the cutting room floor. In fact, Josh Gad puts in just the right dose of humor and charm in his interpretation of LeFou, and he actually can sing pretty darn well! So you’ll end up loving his character by the end, whether or not you agree with the homosexual lifestyle.

Although if you ask me, this remake was never needed to be made. Yes, it did satisfy many of the problems that people have complained about for twenty-five years about the beloved animated classic, but it’s not like this predictable fantasy is doing anything new or risky. If anything, it’s just going to remind us of how much more moving and charming the original is, and we can sleep easy at night now knowing that some plot holes were filled without the animated film having to explain it for us.… Expand

18 of 40 users found this helpful1822

All this user's reviews

8

wstennysonMar 17, 2017

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Review in Portuguese:
A Bela e a Fera apresenta ótima atuação de sua atriz principal, Emma Watson, que apresenta boa desenvoltura em grande parte do filme, conseguindo passar para o telespectador uma Bela tão forte e independente quanto a da animação, as vezes a ultrapassando, apesar da voz modificada pelo auto tune e as forçadas expressões, ou falta delas, em momentos não adequados. O filme contou com um time de atores que quase não apareceram, por motivos óbvios, seus personagens eram animados, Dan Steves, como a fera, mostrou que pode ser um bom ator, nas duas vezes em que apareceu, porém, sua voz no papel de fera deixou a desejar, talvez por conta dos editores de som que deixaram sua voz abafada e quase sem expressão. Seguido por Emma Thompson como madame Samovar, que conseguiu se igualar a sua antecessora, Angela Lansbury, fazendo com quem está assistindo a ame como no filme animado de 91. Não poderia deixar de falar então dos dois querido Ewan McGregor e Ian McKellen, este primeiro que ainda é muito lembrado pelo seu encantador papel em Mouling Rouge, nos lembra porque Lumière é um dos personagens mais queridos do filme, dando sua voz brutalmente sexy, que se encaixou perfeitamente com o personagem; Já o segundo, apesar de ser um grande ator, parece que foi colocado no papel apenas pelo nome, porém, no decorrer do filme, acaba fazendo com que a gente o acabe "suportando". Por fim, Audra McDonald que nos divertiu tanto a ponto de tirar o gosto pesado que o filme tenta mostrar e Nathan Mack como o fofo Chip, como não amar?!. Voltando as atuações visuais, temos uma surpresa e um grande ator da broadway disputando o título de melhor ator coadjuvante do filme, Luke Evans, não só mostrou um Gaston altamente frio e ao mesmo tempo charmoso, como quase cantou como seu antecessor, Richard White. Já Josh Gad, não precisa mostrar que é um baita de um cantor, filho da Broadway, Gad inovou, mostrou um Le Fou confuso quanto sua sexualidade, porém sem o cômico jeito que tinha na animação, a agonia na face do personagem, nos faz ter vontade de entrar dentro do filme e gritar para Gaston que seu parceiro o ama já que o mesmo não faz, o que só contribuiu para a tentativa de deixar o filme mais melodramático. Por fim, chegamos as partes técnicas, com uma baita produção de cenário, vestimentas, maquiagens e cabelo, o filme só pecou em tentar deixar as coisas bem teatrais, porém em momentos em que o exagero tinha que ser mostrado, a produção fica simples, é o exemplo da cena do baile, em que a roupa de Bela fica tão simples que o telespectador acaba se perguntando pelo exagerado vestido "tufado" da versão animada, a fotografia aparece calma, grande e bonita(e as vezes fakes). O Som do filme é bem diferenciado, e não deixa o telespectador tonto com tantas coisas na tela, apesar do excesso de auto tune. Não seria justo fazer o filme sem chamar Alan Menken para a trilha sonora, e o gigante da Disney não fez feio, inovou, mas com o tom do antigo filme e ainda nos presenteou com 3 novas músicas, porém, com destaque só para o solo da Fera, "Evermore" deveria ter entrado no primeiro filme, pois é tão gigante quanto "Belle", as outras suas musicas foram colocadas apenas para fazer um filme ainda mais musical do que já é. Já os efeitos especiais deixaram a desejar, parece que os editores se preocuparam nos detalhes dos cômodos, e nos lobos, que ficaram perfeitos, mas esqueceram do personagem principal, a Fera, o personagem ficou tão falso que você percebe que a Emma Watson está praticamente atuando sozinha. Por falar em edição, esta pecou em várias partes, desde cortes no meio da cena, e o desfoque exagerado. Por fim, como já abordado nesta crítica, o filme seguiu fielmente sua primeira versão, com apenas algumas mudanças, a representatividade é mostrada, não com excessividade, mas com a normalidade que a Disney passou a acreditar de uns anos para cá. O diretor Bill Condon, que com uma carta verde da própria Disney, colocou personagens negros na historia, mesmo não precisando, além de deixar explicito a sexualidade de Le Fou que era nítida mas foi abafada na animação de 91 quando a Disney ainda era conservadora, a melhor cena fica na hora em que três homens são travestidos de mulher pela Senhora Garderobe, sendo que um deles gostou, aqui fica meus parabéns ao Diretor. A Disney segue sua jornada de remakes Live-Actions de suas obras mais famosas, e com a Bela e a Fera, o primeiro filme de animação a concorrer ao Oscar de Melhor Filme, a pressão para que o filme saísse perfeito era enorme, felizmente e mais uma vez, a gigante acertou. A Bela e a fera segue seu sucesso, conquistando novos telespectadores. Nota: 8,3… Expand

5 of 21 users found this helpful516

All this user's reviews

10

seabanMar 17, 2017

I'm a 30 year old guy with young kids. I saw it with my wife and we both loved it. Its not a new take on Beauty and the Beast and it's wonderful. They recreated the animited version and made a wonderful movie. The music was spot on, whichI'm a 30 year old guy with young kids. I saw it with my wife and we both loved it. Its not a new take on Beauty and the Beast and it's wonderful. They recreated the animited version and made a wonderful movie. The music was spot on, which there was lots. The acting great. It was just a great movie. I wemt in with low expectation based on the journalistic reviews and now i have no idea what the lower scores are talking about. Maybe im not refined enough to understand but i hope i never am if it means I stop enjoying movies like this.… Expand

11 of 28 users found this helpful1117

All this user's reviews

10

dangersMar 17, 2017

What's wrong with critics? What's with all the controversy? This movie is a masterpiece. It’s very well done. I loved it for its cast, its faithfulness to the original movie, its production design, visual effects and music. Everything aboutWhat's wrong with critics? What's with all the controversy? This movie is a masterpiece. It’s very well done. I loved it for its cast, its faithfulness to the original movie, its production design, visual effects and music. Everything about it is perfect. It will surely grab some Oscars.… Expand

77 of 113 users found this helpful7736

All this user's reviews

6

EpicLadySpongeMar 17, 2017

This Beauty and the Beast is a great take on Disney's 1991 film of the same name. The offer is given directly right away to people that loves to see Disney's live action adaptions of their classic animated originals and it shows Disney canThis Beauty and the Beast is a great take on Disney's 1991 film of the same name. The offer is given directly right away to people that loves to see Disney's live action adaptions of their classic animated originals and it shows Disney can shoot for the moon in a game of hearts. However, when you take all the great elements from the film away, all of what's left remains a stale, ludicrous attempt to outshine Disney's own 1991 film. Shows that even Disney, king of filmmaking, can sometimes make mistakes and a huge one at it too.… Expand

7 of 19 users found this helpful712

All this user's reviews

Beauty and the Beast

User Reviews